Tinubu Govt Withholds ₦131.5bn Osun LG Funds for 10 Months Despite Supreme Court Ruling

The Tinubu-led Federal Government has allegedly withheld ₦131.5 billion in local government allocations meant for Osun State for 10 months, despite a Supreme Court ruling declaring such action unlawful.

A review of FAAC data from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation shows that the unpaid funds cover the period from March to December 2025. The money was meant for Osun’s local governments to provide basic services at the grassroots.

Observers say the continued withholding of the funds has crippled local governance and raises serious concerns about respect for the rule of law.

How long will court judgments be ignored while citizens suffer?

#OsunState #Tinubu #FAAC #LocalGovernmentFunds #RuleOfLaw #NigeriaPolitics #Injustice

Security Agents Abduct Critic of Interior Minister Tunji-Ojo in Ondo, Lawyer Demands Immediate Release

Security operatives suspected to be police officers have reportedly whisked away Prince Owolemi Emorioloye, a vocal critic of Interior Minister Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, from his residence in Igbokoda, Ondo State. Emorioloye, also known as Emotel, was allegedly manhandled by armed men who arrived in unmarked Hilux vans, with his whereabouts remaining unknown. His lawyers have petitioned the Inspector-General of Police, describing the arrest as unlawful and a violation of his fundamental rights. They are demanding his immediate release or arraignment in court, warning of legal action if authorities fail to comply.

#legalaction

Witchcraft Accusations, Agwu Beliefs and Police Abuse in Imo State — How Extortion and Impunity Thrive

This opinion piece by Leo Igwe exposes how witchcraft accusations and beliefs surrounding Agwu rituals are being exploited by families, vigilantes and even police officers in Imo State to justify abuse, extortion and human rights violations. Using the case of 70-year-old Joseph Ottih and his family, the article details alleged police brutality, illegal arrests, destruction of property and collusion between relatives, vigilantes and the anti-kidnapping unit (Tigerbase). Igwe argues that witchcraft accusations are unlawful under Nigerian law, that freedom of religion is constitutionally protected, and that the police must enforce the law—not tradition or superstition. The Advocacy for Alleged Witches (AfAW) vows legal support for the victims, insisting that witch-hunting, ritual policing and religious bias within law enforcement must end.

Family Cries Out as Ogun Police Arrest Man for Hoisting Yoruba Nation Flag, Delay Court Trial

A family in distress has accused the Ogun State Police Command of unlawfully detaining Owolaju Adekunle John after his arrest for allegedly attempting to replace the Nigerian flag with a Yoruba Nation flag in Odeda. Arrested on January 9 alongside two others, Owolaju has remained in custody at Eleweran Police Station without being charged to court, despite repeated promises by police. The uncertainty has reportedly worsened his widowed mother’s health. While police confirmed the arrest, they gave no clear timeline for arraignment, deepening concerns over his continued detention.


#YorubaNation #PoliceDetention #OgunNews

My Statement on Today’s Court Proceedings Regarding the #FreeNnamdiKanuNow Protest

Earlier today, alongside my legal team led by Marshal D. F. Abubakar, I addressed the progress of our civil lawsuit arising from my illegal arrest, trial, and unlawful detention at Kuje Prison following the #FreeNnamdiKanuNow protest of October 20, 2025.

This lawsuit seeks a public apology, financial compensation, and enforcement actions against the illegally appointed Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, the Nigeria Police Force, and the Minister of Justice/Attorney General of the Federation for their unlawful actions.

At today’s court sitting, the Nigeria Police Force neither appeared nor was represented by counsel. The presiding judge, Justice Umar, formally noted their absence and ruled that the case is ready to proceed to the next stage.

At the next adjourned date, we will adopt our written submissions, after which the court will fix a definite date for judgment.

We remain firm and committed to demanding justice and accountability for the unlawful treatment of peaceful protesters during that historic protest.

#FreeNnamdiKanuNow #JusticeForProtesters #RuleOfLaw #EndPoliceAbuse #HumanRights #Accountability #NigeriaJustice #PeacefulProtest

Anambra Police Don Arrest Masquerader Wey Beat People for Awgbu!

Anambra State Police don arrest one masquerader wey dem catch for viral video dey attack Awgbu people for Orumba North LGA. Police talk say this kain behavior no dey acceptable, unlawful, and dem no go tolerate am, because culture no suppose turn to weapon wey go terrorize people.

SP Tochukwu Ikenga yan say police dey investigate the matter and go update public as e dey go. This kain wahala no dey only happen for Anambra – Akwa Ibom State sef don dey see same kind masquerade gbege, wey make government ban public masquerade show till further notice.

Police and government talk say anybody wey dey use masquerade dey cause gbege go face law, because culture na for enjoyment and respect, no be to scare or hurt community. People dey urged to dey vigilant, report any strange activity, make law and order shine for everywhere.

Na so Anambra dey show say law go catch anybody wey no dey respect peace, even if dem hide under mask.

BREAKING NEWS: Alleged Privacy Invasion: Lagos Court Rules In Falana’s Favour, Awards $25,000 Damages Against Meta

A Lagos State High Court sitting at Tafawa Balewa Square has awarded $25,000 in damages in favour of renowned human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) against Meta Platforms Inc., the U.S.-based tech giant owned by Mark Zuckerberg, over alleged invasion of privacy.

In a judgment delivered on Tuesday, Justice Olalekan Oresanya held that Meta, as a global technology company that hosts and monetises content, owes a duty of care to individuals affected by materials published on its platform.

Falana, through his lawyer Olumide Babalola, accused Meta of publishing motion images and a voice caption titled “AfriCare Health Centre” on Facebook, falsely suggesting that he was suffering from prostatitis. He argued that the publication violated his constitutional right to privacy under Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution, as well as provisions of the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023.

The court agreed that the publication amounted to an unlawful intrusion into Falana’s private life, despite his status as a public figure, and ruled in his favour in the $5 million suit.

Lawyer Ejiofor Drag Katsina Govt Over Release Of 70 Suspected Terrorists, Warn Say Na ‘Institutionalised Insecurity

Na wah oo! Human rights lawyer Ifeanyi Ejiofor don condemn Katsina State government for reportedly releasing 70 suspected bandits and terrorists under “peace accord.” Ejiofor yan say this kain move na dangerous policy wey fit scatter Naija stability, especially for North. E talk say to dey negotiate with armed gangs and dey give dem legitimacy na like to reward violence, and e go dey teach say blood and guns fit settle matter.

Ejiofor also drag Nigerian govt and security agencies, say dem dey silent, like dem dey tacitly support the release. E use am compare the wahala to DSS wey confirm say Mrs. Calista Ifedi die for detention without trial, alongside many Igbo youths wey dey held unlawfully. E yan say South-East leaders must rise, demand accountability, and prosecute guilty persons properly.

Ejiofor warn say if terror appeasement continue, Nigeria fit dey sit “on top keg of gunpowder,” as more areas fit dey ceded to jihadist terror. Na serious gbege oo!

Brigadier General Archibong Don Dey Detain Over Links To Retired Gen. Ali-Keffi, Weh Don Blow Buratai Case

Na serious gbege dey oo! Brig. Gen. Gabriel Archibong don dey held incommunicado for over 10 days by Army. Him family and lawyers no fit see am. Sources yan say e arrest connect with how Archibong dey gist plenty with retired Gen. Ali-Keffi, wey don expose wahala of terrorists finance wey involve Buratai and other top oga dem.

Ali-Keffi head Operation Service Wide (OSW), wey dey track terrorist financiers, yan say some big suspects wey dem arrest dey linked to Buratai, Emefiele, Malami, and Yahaya. But dem all release under “suspicious circumstances.” Archibong allegedly no dey cooperate with Army, so dem carry am go Army Special Investigation Bureau, seize him laptop and phone, even search him house.

Military sources dey fear say this fit spoil Archibong career and wellbeing. Dem yan say Buratai dey behind the gbege, dey use Army protect himself, make e no face wahala for his past. Ali-Keffi don sue Army for billions over unlawful detention, torture, and forced retirement. Na serious power play between retired and serving generals dem dey oo!

Wahala no dey finish oo! Industrial Court Order Enugu Neuro Hospital Make Dem Reinstate Sacked MD, Declare Sack Illegal

The National Industrial Court, Abuja Division, don order the immediate reinstatement of Professor Monday Igwe as Medical Director of the Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Enugu, after ruling that his removal was unlawful, null and void. Justice Emmanuel Subilim give the judgement in the suit between Prof. Igwe and seven defendants, also voiding the appointment of Dr. Unaogu Nneka as substantive MD during the pendency of the case, describing the action as overreaching and illegal. The court hold say Prof. Igwe don successfully prove his case and order make he return to office to complete the remaining three years and five months of his tenure. Justice Subilim also direct the defendants to pay all his outstanding emoluments from September 2023 till the date of judgement. The court further rule that the procedure used to terminate his appointment was arbitrary, illegal and a clear breach of statutory regulations guiding his employment. In addition, the court award ₦3 million in damages in favour of Prof. Igwe. Wahala oo, court don scatter the sack.

CBN Wahala Burst! 62 Sacked Workers Tell Court: Dismiss Bank’s Motion, Restore Our Jobs

Wahala don enter court as 62 former staff of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) have asked the National Industrial Court in Abuja to throw out the bank’s application seeking to change the procedure of their suit challenging their sack. The ex-workers opposed a motion by CBN’s lawyer, Wilson Inam, SAN, who asked the court to convert their originating summons to a writ of summons, arguing that the case involved disputed facts requiring oral evidence. But the claimants’ counsel, Ola Olanipekun, SAN, insisted that the bank had not filed a counter affidavit, making its request legally defective. He told the court that until pleadings are completed, the matter cannot be converted, adding that only the workers’ processes were properly before the court. The workers are seeking to nullify their termination letters issued under a “Re-Organisation” exercise in 2024, describing the sack as unlawful and contrary to the CBN Act and internal policies. They also want reinstatement and full payment of salaries and entitlements. Justice Osatohanmwen Obaseki-Osaghae adjourned the case to February 10 for ruling.

Edo Rights Group Accuses Uromi DPO of Harassing Activist, Demands Police Action

The Edo State Civil Society Coalition for Human Rights has accused the Divisional Police Officer of Uromi Division, CSP Monday Agbon, of intimidation, abuse of office, and targeted harassment of activist Comrade General Henry Oziegbe.

In a statement issued on Saturday, the coalition said Oziegbe, a known social justice advocate, has faced sustained reprisals allegedly linked to his criticism of police extortion and systemic injustice in Uromi.

The group disclosed that multiple petitions had earlier been submitted to the Edo State Commissioner of Police, accusing the DPO of extortion, bribery, and abuse of authority. Rather than submit to investigation, the coalition alleged, the officer responded with threats, intimidation, and attempts to criminalise the activist.

According to the statement, jointly signed by Coordinator Marxist Kola Edokpayi and Secretary-General Comrade Aghatise Raphael, the DPO allegedly threatened to fabricate charges against Oziegbe and later branded him a cultist—an accusation the coalition described as false, reckless, and dangerous.

The coalition further claimed that following a directive from the Commissioner of Police to review one of the petitions, the DPO sought to use the Anti-Cultism Unit in Benin City to arrest Oziegbe. However, the unit reportedly declined after finding no factual or evidentiary basis for the allegations.

“The Anti-Cultism Unit, acting with commendable professional integrity, refused to comply after establishing that the claims were entirely unfounded,” the group said.

Describing Oziegbe as “a conscientious dissenter and defender of the oppressed,” the coalition argued that any attempt to arrest or detain him would amount to a violation of his constitutional rights. Citing Section 35 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), it warned against arbitrary arrest, detention, or enforced disappearance.

The group also stated that any harm or unlawful action against the activist would be held personally against the DPO and any officers involved.

Consequently, the coalition called on the Inspector-General of Police, the Police Service Commission, the National Human Rights Commission, and other oversight bodies to intervene, investigate the allegations, and prevent what it described as a growing culture of impunity.

“We will not capitulate. We will not be intimidated. An injury to one remains an injury to all,” the coalition declared.

Is Nnamdi Kanu Being Illegally Detained? Nigerian Jewish Leader Visits IPOB Founder in Sokoto Prison, Rejects Terrorism Label and Demands His Immediate Release

Is the continued detention of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), legally justified—or is it a violation of justice and human rights? This question has been reignited following a high-profile prison visit by Kohen Daniel Onuoha, a Nigerian Jewish cleric and spiritual leader of the Peace of Yahweh Synagogue and founder of Eastern Judaism, who met Kanu at the Sokoto Correctional Facility on January 10, 2026.

Describing the visit as an act of spiritual and moral solidarity, Onuoha said he was accompanied by his wife and representatives of Jewish congregations in Nigeria’s former Eastern Region, whom he said “faithfully observe the Ten Commandments.” According to him, the visit symbolised years of prayers and sacrifices by his community for Kanu’s freedom.

“For over five years, we have remained steadfast in daily sacrifices and prayers to Elohim without interruption,” Onuoha said, adding that the prison visit reaffirmed his commitment to justice and liberty.

During the visit, the cleric directly challenged the legal foundation of Kanu’s continued incarceration, urging the international community, legal experts, and human rights organisations to examine what he described as questionable legal grounds for the case. He argued that Kanu’s prosecution was based on a repealed law, making the detention unlawful.

Onuoha also rejected the designation of Kanu and IPOB as terrorists, insisting that neither the separatist leader nor the movement had committed violent acts. “Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is not a terrorist, and IPOB is not a terrorist organisation,” he declared, adding that Kanu’s ordeal stemmed from the peaceful exercise of self-determination and his public criticism of alleged abuses by political elites, foreign interests, and local power structures.

He further contended that speech alone cannot justify criminal conviction, stressing that verbal expressions or broadcasts without evidence of violence should not result in imprisonment. Calling for Kanu’s “immediate and unconditional release,” the Jewish leader said such action was necessary to uphold justice and the rule of law.

Beyond Kanu’s case, Onuoha appealed for broader international intervention, arguing that Biafrans continue to face marginalisation, oppression, and violence. He commended U.S. President Donald Trump for what he described as efforts to protect Christians in Nigeria and urged increased global pressure on Nigerian authorities over alleged human rights violations.

In his closing remarks, Onuoha called on Kanu’s supporters, Biafrans, Jews, and human rights advocates to remain peaceful, resilient, and steadfast, expressing confidence that justice would ultimately prevail.

The visit raises urgent questions: Is Nnamdi Kanu’s detention legally valid? Has the terrorism label been misapplied? And will international scrutiny finally force a reassessment of one of Nigeria’s most controversial political prosecutions?

Did a Detainee Die Unlawfully in NSCDC Custody? Kano Command Removes Fagge Divisional Officer as Police Launch Investigation Into Custodial Death

Did the death of a suspect inside a security facility point to deeper issues of accountability within Nigeria’s law enforcement system? The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) in Kano State has removed the Divisional Officer in charge of the Fagge office after a suspect reportedly died while in custody, triggering a formal investigation and public scrutiny.

According to the NSCDC’s spokesperson, Ibrahim Abdullahi, the officer in charge, SC Amina Musa Kolawale, was relieved of her position following the incident. All officers and personnel who were on duty at the time of the suspect’s death have also been handed over to the Nigerian Police, Kano State Command, for further investigation and possible disciplinary or legal action.

The NSCDC Commandant in Kano, Mohammed Hassan Agalama, approved the removal after setting up a panel of inquiry to conduct what the agency described as a discreet, fair, and impartial investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death. A new divisional head, CSC Bashir Isa Abubakar, has since been appointed to take over leadership at the Fagge office.

In a public appeal, the NSCDC urged residents to remain calm, reaffirming its commitment to the sanctity of life, human rights, professionalism, standard operating procedures, integrity, and the rule of law. The Corps stressed that it would not shield any officer found culpable and that accountability would guide the outcome of the probe.

The case has reignited concerns about custodial deaths in Nigeria, the treatment of suspects, and whether security agencies are doing enough to ensure due process and protection of fundamental rights. As investigations proceed under police oversight, many Nigerians are asking critical questions: What caused the suspect’s death? Were proper procedures followed? And will this action mark a turning point for transparency and reform within the security services?

Jigawa Court Orders Arrest of DSS Officer Over Alleged Abduction, Sexual Exploitation, and Forced Conversion of 16-Year-Old Girl

A Magistrate Court sitting in Hadejia, Jigawa State, has ordered the arrest of a serving officer of Nigeria’s Department of State Services (DSS), Ifeanyi Festus, over allegations of child abduction, sexual exploitation, unlawful detention, and forcible religious conversion involving a 16-year-old girl, Walida Abdulhadi.

The directive was issued by His Worship, Sadisu Musa Esq., in Suit No: DCC/01/2026, following a petition filed by Abuja-based law firm Gamji Lawchain on behalf of Walida’s father, Alhaji Abdulhadi Ibrahim. The court ordered the Jigawa State Commissioner of Police or senior DSS officials to arrest the officer and discreetly investigate the allegations under Sections 125 and 102(5) of the Jigawa State Administration of Criminal Justice Law (ACJL). It also directed the DSS to immediately release and reunite the girl with her parents.

According to the petition dated January 4, 2026, Walida was allegedly abducted from Hadejia over two years ago when she was still a minor and legally incapable of consenting to any sexual relationship. The family reportedly searched for her for years, and the prolonged trauma is said to have contributed to the death of her mother.

The case reportedly resurfaced on January 1, 2026, when the accused officer allegedly contacted the girl’s father, claiming Walida had been living with him, had given birth to his child, and that he was now prepared to marry her. When a family representative was sent to Abuja, he was allegedly taken to a DSS facility at Karmajiji, where officials reportedly confirmed that Walida had been living within the DSS estate. Requests for her release were allegedly refused.

The petition further claims that while under this custody, the teenager was allegedly converted from Islam to Christianity without parental consent and subjected to sexual exploitation that resulted in pregnancy and childbirth while she was still underage. The lawyers alleged that the acts could not have occurred without the knowledge or tacit approval of other officers, describing the matter as potential institutional complicity rather than isolated misconduct.

In its ruling, the court emphasized the need for immediate investigation and ordered that Walida be released and reunited with her family. The case has since generated widespread public attention, raising serious questions about child protection, abuse of power, religious freedom, and accountability within Nigeria’s security agencies.

Did Abdulfatah Ahmed Divert ₦5.78 Billion UBEC Funds? Why Kwara Court Adjourned Ex-Governor’s Fraud Trial to February 16

A Kwara State High Court sitting in Ilorin has adjourned the ₦5.78 billion alleged fraud trial of former Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed and his former Commissioner for Finance, Ademola Banu, raising fresh questions about how public education funds were allegedly diverted under the previous administration. The case, which resumed before Justice Mahmud Abdulgafar, was postponed to February 16, 2026, following legal objections during the presentation of evidence by the prosecution.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), through its Ilorin Zonal Directorate, is prosecuting the former officials over claims that funds meant for educational development were unlawfully redirected. According to the EFCC, the defendants approved the use of Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) matching grants—money specifically allocated for building and upgrading primary and junior secondary schools across Kwara’s 16 local government areas—to pay civil servants’ salaries, contrary to the conditions attached to the funds.

During the latest hearing, the prosecution called its sixth witness, Stanley Ujilibo, who told the court that the EFCC obtained bank statements from Polaris Bank (formerly Skye Bank) and Guaranty Trust Bank as part of its investigation. He explained that official letters dated August 1, 2025, were sent to both banks requesting records of Kwara State Government accounts. The banks acknowledged the requests and provided the statements, which were admitted as exhibits by the court.

The trial further revisited earlier testimony by a former Accountant-General of Kwara State, Suleiman Oluwadare Ishola, who stated that ₦1 billion from UBEC matching grants was borrowed in 2015 by the Ahmed administration to pay salaries and pensions. This revelation has intensified public scrutiny over whether funds intended for school infrastructure were systematically diverted for recurrent government expenses.

However, proceedings were briefly stalled when the EFCC attempted to tender additional documents from the Ministry of Finance and the Office of the Accountant-General. Defence counsel, led by Kamaldeen Ajibade, objected on procedural grounds, arguing that the documents had not been properly highlighted for clarity and reference. Justice Abdulgafar upheld the objection and consequently adjourned the case.

The adjournment has sparked debate across Kwara State and beyond: Was public education funding sacrificed to cover salary obligations? Did the former administration violate the terms governing UBEC grants? And will the evidence presented be enough to establish criminal responsibility?

As the trial continues, the case stands as a major test of accountability in Nigeria’s anti-corruption efforts, particularly regarding the management of education funds and the prosecution of high-profile political figures.

Can a Business Owner Detain Drivers Without a Court Order? How an Abia Solar Panel Dispute Turned Into Alleged Illegal Detention, Vehicle Seizure and a Growing Human Rights Outcry

A commercial disagreement over damaged solar panels has escalated into a potential human rights controversy in Bende, Abia State, after two drivers were allegedly held for more than 10 days without a court order by a company executive demanding compensation. The case has raised troubling questions about the legality of “self-help” in business disputes and whether private citizens can lawfully restrict movement or seize property outside the courts.

The drivers, Michael and Mutiu Ade, say they have been confined since December 28, 2025, at the private residence of Martin Mbaka, Managing Director and CEO of Quietstorm Group, after seven solar panels delivered to the premises were found cracked. They allege their vehicle—belonging to Dr. Adeleke Oshin—was immobilised, tyres deflated, keys taken, and that they were forced to sleep inside the bus under harsh conditions, with their freedom of movement restricted.

According to the drivers, the panels were already cracked during loading in Lagos, and they were assured by the sender that the owner was aware. However, upon arrival in Abia, they claim the gate was locked after offloading and they were told they would not be allowed to leave unless the damaged panels were replaced or paid for. “This is a civil issue, but we are being detained like criminals,” Michael said, adding that appeals, pleas and even attempts at police intervention have not secured their release.

Mr. Mbaka confirmed that the vehicle remains in his custody, insisting that ₦840,000 must be paid or replacement panels provided before it is released. His personal assistant, Franklin Azubike, rejected allegations of unlawful detention, arguing that the transporter was negligent, that the solar equipment was worth ₦30–40 million, and that the damaged panels resulted from improper loading alongside other goods. The company says it merely seeks compensation for losses and denies any wrongdoing.

However, human rights lawyers and civil society advocates strongly dispute that position. Legal experts stress that no private individual has the authority to detain another person, restrict movement, or seize property over a civil dispute. Claims for damages, they argue, must be pursued through the courts, not by force or confinement. The drivers maintain that they do not own the vehicle and should not be punished for a disagreement between buyer and sender.

As of the time of reporting, there has been no official statement from the Abia State Police Command on whether the continued detention is under investigation. Rights groups are now calling for urgent intervention to secure the drivers’ freedom and ensure that any compensation claims are resolved strictly within the law.

The case has sparked wider concern about a dangerous trend of turning business disputes into extrajudicial punishment. It raises critical questions: Can a company executive legally hold people and property over a commercial disagreement? Where does civil liability end and unlawful detention begin? And what protections exist for ordinary workers caught between powerful interests? As the drivers continue to plead for their liberty, the incident has become a test of rule of law, personal freedom, and accountability in Nigeria’s commercial and security landscape.

Did an Ondo DPO Assault a Lawyer at a Police Station? Why a Law Firm Has Petitioned the IGP and Police Service Commission Over Alleged Abuse of Power

A Lagos- and Ondo-based law firm, Tope Temokun Chambers, has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), the Police Service Commission (PSC), and other oversight bodies over allegations of assault, intimidation, abuse of office, and obstruction of justice involving the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) of Ore Division in Ondo State, Mr. Moses Adeduro.

According to the petitions, the incident occurred on January 8, 2026, when one of the firm’s lawyers, Adedotun Emmanuel Adegoroye, Esq., accompanied a client—Mrs. Stella Oluwasegun, Managing Director of Niret Marketing Product Company Limited—to the Ore Divisional Police Station to formally report a case of alleged stealing and criminal conversion of company goods valued at about ₦20.4 million.

The firm stated that the complaint followed the discovery that some employees of the company, allegedly acting in collaboration with a supplier’s staff and a driver, unlawfully removed and sold company goods. It added that some receivers of the allegedly stolen items had already been arrested prior to the visit.

However, the law firm alleged that upon arrival at the police station, officers attempted to coerce the complainant into an informal settlement without first taking her statement or properly documenting the complaint. When their counsel reportedly objected and insisted on due process, he was directed to see the DPO.

What happened next, according to the petition, escalated into intimidation and physical assault. The firm alleged that the DPO dismissed the presence of legal representation, reportedly stating that lawyers were not needed at the police station, and ordered that the lawyer be forcibly removed from his office. In the process, a police officer was said to have physically grabbed and ejected the lawyer.

Tope Temokun Chambers described the alleged conduct as a grave abuse of office, an unlawful assault on a legal practitioner, and a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice. The firm argued that the actions violated multiple laws, including the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the Police Act and Regulations, and the Legal Practitioners Act, all of which guarantee citizens’ right to legal representation and protect lawyers in the lawful discharge of their duties.

In its petitions, the firm demanded:

An immediate and thorough investigation into the conduct of the DPO and other officers involved, with appropriate disciplinary measures if the allegations are proven;

A formal written apology to the affected lawyer; and

That the underlying criminal complaint be taken over by higher police authorities to ensure impartial investigation and public confidence.


The firm further claimed it had been reliably informed of similar complaints of misconduct previously made against the same DPO, raising concerns about a possible pattern of abuse of authority.

Emphasising that the petitions were filed in the interest of justice and professionalism, the firm stressed that lawyers must be allowed to perform their duties without fear of harassment, violence, or intimidation, urging authorities to act decisively to uphold the rule of law and restore confidence in the Nigeria Police Force.

Malami Delays Bail as DSS Besiege Kuje Prison Over Terrorism Financing Probe – Inside the High-Stakes Showdown

Former Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN), has reportedly slowed the processing of his bail following a heavy deployment of Department of State Services (DSS) operatives at the Kuje Medium Security Custodial Centre (MSCC) in Abuja. Sources indicate that over 50 DSS officers established a perimeter around the prison, arriving in a convoy of approximately six Toyota Hilux vans, amid fears that Malami could be immediately rearrested in connection with an ongoing terrorism financing investigation.

Malami, who was granted bail by the Federal High Court in Abuja in his N8.7 billion money laundering case, instructed his legal team to delay the release process, remaining in the VIP segregation cell of the prison, a section previously refurbished by former police intelligence chief Abba Kyari and known for housing high-profile detainees. His son, Abubakar Abdulaziz, and fourth wife, Hajia Bashir Asabe, remain at the facility, with Abdulaziz reportedly admitted to the prison clinic for observation after falling ill.

The EFCC had arraigned Malami, Asabe, and Abdulaziz on a 16-count charge involving conspiracy, laundering, and concealment of unlawful proceeds totaling ₦8,713,923,759.49 under the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. While terrorism financing is not part of the formal charges, security sources link ongoing investigations to Malami and other high-profile figures regarding the flow of Abacha loot recovered from Switzerland and the UK.

Retired Army General Danjuma Ali-Keffi, former head of counter-terrorism Task Force Operation Service Wide (OSW), revealed that investigations into Boko Haram financiers exposed networks allegedly connected to senior military officers, top financial officials, and government figures, including Malami. Ali-Keffi claimed Malami interfered with these investigations by removing key prosecutors and influencing the release of certain suspects, actions that undermined anti-terrorism operations.

This unfolding situation underscores heightened tensions between Nigerian law enforcement agencies and high-profile figures, highlighting the complex interplay of money laundering, terrorism financing probes, and political influence. Authorities remain on high alert as Malami’s legal maneuvering continues amid nationwide scrutiny of his activities.

Why Are Nigerian Nurses Being Forced to Do Cleaners’ Jobs? Are Hospital CMDs Exploiting Strikes to Intimidate Health Workers Across the Country?

A growing controversy is shaking Nigeria’s healthcare sector after the Elegant Nurses Forum accused hospital managements across the country of forcing nurses to perform cleaning and other menial duties, a practice the group describes as unethical, unlawful, and professionally degrading.

In a press statement signed by Nurse Thomas Abiodun Olamide, the forum said it had received multiple complaints from health institutions nationwide, alleging that some Chief Medical Directors (CMDs) are exploiting the ongoing strike by hospital cleaners under the Joint Health Sector Unions (JOHESU) to compel nurses to take over sanitation work.

According to the forum, this practice violates professional ethics, international best practices, and the legal framework governing nursing in Nigeria. It warned that compelling nurses to abandon clinical responsibilities for cleaning duties not only demeans the profession but also endangers patient safety and healthcare quality.

The group disclosed that over ten days ago, nurses at the Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Makurdi, Benue State, formally complained of threats and coercion to assume cleaners’ duties. Similar complaints were later received from the Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital (OOUTH), Sagamu, Ogun State, along with reports from other tertiary and secondary health facilities nationwide.

The forum expressed particular concern over the leadership at OOUTH, alleging a persistent pattern of intimidation and harassment of nurses by the hospital’s CMD. According to the statement, nurses were reportedly threatened with job loss, with allegations that political connections were being used to exert pressure. The forum described this as a gross abuse of office, questioning the competence, temperament, and ethical standing of such leadership.

It further alleged that political interference rather than merit has influenced some CMD appointments, warning that hospitals were being transformed into “tools of oppression” instead of institutions dedicated to patient-centred care.

Emphasising the professional role of nurses, the forum stated that nurses are trained healthcare practitioners whose duties include patient care, disease prevention, health promotion, and clinical management—not sanitation. Forcing them into menial tasks, it said, devalues their expertise, undermines healthcare delivery, and weakens the entire system.

In its demands, the Elegant Nurses Forum called for:

Immediate cessation of all intimidation, threats, and coercion of nurses into non-nursing duties;

Clear directives from federal and state health ministries prohibiting the assignment of cleaning or other unrelated tasks to nurses;

Independent investigations and disciplinary action against erring CMDs and administrators;

Protection of nurses from victimisation and harassment; and

Transparent, merit-based appointments to hospital leadership positions free from political interference.


The forum vowed it would not remain silent while nurses are treated as expendable labour and stripped of their professional identity. “Healthcare leadership must be about service, competence, and accountability—not intimidation, arrogance, and abuse of power,” the statement concluded.

As the allegations spread across multiple states, the central question remains: are hospital authorities protecting patient care—or sacrificing professionalism for power?