IPOB reacts as Kenyan court declares Nnamdi Kanu’s arrest, extradition illegal.

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has hailed a landmark judgment by the High Court of Kenya, which declared the abduction and forced transfer of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021 as unlawful and unconstitutional.

In a ruling delivered on 24 June 2025, Justice E.C. Mwita condemned both the Kenyan and Nigerian governments for gross violations of Kanu’s fundamental rights and awarded him KSh10 million in compensatory damages.

Justice Mwita, in his judgment, stated, “The government of Kenya violated the Constitution and Mr. Nnamdi Kanu’s rights and fundamental freedoms. Having entered Kenya lawfully, he was subject to the protection offered by the Constitution of Kenya 2010. However, he was abducted, kept in solitary confinement, tortured, and forcibly removed from Kenya without following the law.”

The court further declared that Kanu’s abduction, incommunicado detention, and denial of food, water, and medication were flagrant breaches of his constitutional rights. It also ruled that his forcible removal to Nigeria violated Kenyan laws and international legal standards.

KENYAN COURT DECLARES
TRANSFER OF NNAMDI KANU TO NIGERIA ILLEGAL.

A High Court in Nairobi has ruled that the transfer of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021 was illegal and unconstitutional.

Delivering judgment, Justice E.C. Mwita declared that the Kenyan government violated Kanu’s fundamental rights during the process that led to his rendition.

“Having considered the pleadings and arguments by parties, the decisions relied on, the Constitution and the law, I come to the following conclusions,” the judge stated.

“First, the government of Kenya violated the Constitution and Mr. Nnamdi Kanu’s rights and fundamental freedoms. Having entered Kenya lawfully, he was subject to the protection offered by the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the government of Kenya had an obligation to uphold and protect his rights and fundamental freedoms.

“Mr. Nnamdi was however abducted, kept in solitude confinement, tortured and denied food and medication, a breach of basic rights. He was chained, humiliated, ridiculed and held in contempt and later forcibly removed from Kenya without following the law in violation of his rights and fundamental freedoms for which the government of Kenya is liable,” Justice Mwita ruled.

The court awarded Kanu general damages of 10 million Kenyan shillings as compensation for the rights violations.

“Based on the above conclusions, the court makes the following declarations and orders it considers appropriate;

“A declaration is hereby issued that the abduction of Mr. Nwannekaenvi Nnamdi Kenny Okwu Kanu; holding him in incommunicado confinement, torturing him and denying him food, water, medication and other basic necessities was a violation of his rights and fundamental freedoms.

“A declaration is hereby issued that the abduction and subsequent forcible removal of Mr. Nwannekaenvi Nnamdi Kenny Okwu-Kanu from Kenya to Nigeria was in violation of the laws of Kenya; his rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of movement and security of the person guaranteed by the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and, therefore, unconstitutional and illegal.

“An order for compensation is hereby issued awarding Mr. Nwannekaenvi Nnamdi Kenny Okwu-Kanu general damages of Kshs 10,000,000 against the Attorney General of Kenya on behalf of the government of Kenya for the violation of Mr. Nwannekaenvi Nnamdi Kenny Okwu-Kanu’s constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms,” the judge added.

The ruling follows Kanu’s legal challenge over his arrest and transfer from Kenya to Nigeria without due process.

Nnamdi Kanu Being Tried Under Dead Laws, No Evidence Of Terrorism IPOB

JUST IN: Prosecution closes case in Nnamdi Kanu’s terrorism trial.

The prosecution in the terrorism trial of detained self-acclaimed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) closed its case on Thursday after calling five witnesses.

Prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) announced the closure of the prosecution’s case after its fifth witness (PW5) concluded his testimony

A Federal High Court in Abuja was on Wednesday, alleged that the crowd incitement by the Biafra nation agitator, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu through his Biafra Radio Broadcast was responsible for the widespread violence in the South Eastern part of the country.

The Deputy Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Abayomi Akinruntan has resigned his position, citing the need to align with the conventional arrangement of elective position in the state.


The resignation letter of the former deputy speaker – representing Ilaje Constituency 1, – who is the son of the Olugbo of Ugbo Kingdom, Oba Fredrick Akinruntan, was read at the floor of the Assembly by the Clerk, Benjamin Jayeiola.

Akinruntan, who was absent during the plenary, was elected as the Deputy Speaker of the Assembly in June 2023, a position he occupied until his resignation.


The resignation letter read: “I hereby tender my resignation from the office of the Deputy Speaker effective from today, 2nd June, 2025. Recall the House was inaugurated June, 2023 and I was unanimously elected as Deputy Speaker by members as stipulated in our standing order.

“My resignation is borne out of the need to align with the conventional arrangement in power sharing of elective positions in the state. I want to appreciate all members and staff for their contributions and support.”

Following Akinruntan’s resignation, the lawmaker representing Okitipupa Constituency 2, Ololade Gbegude was subsequently nominated by Oluwatoyin Japheth (Akoko North East Constituency) and seconded by Chris Ayebusiwa (Okitipupa Constituency 1) as the new Deputy Speaker.


Following the nomination of Gbegudu, which was not contested, he was subsequently sworn in as the Deputy Speaker with the pledge that he will serve in his new role with due diligence.

Similarly, the Majority Leader of the Assembly, Oluwole Ogunmolasuyi, also stepped down from his position, with the lawmaker representing Ose Constituency, Olatunji Oshati, announced as the new Majority Leader.

Also, Muritala Sulaiman, representing Akoko South East, was announced as the new Chief Whip, while Fabiyi Olatunji, Odigbo Constituency 1, becomes the Whip of the Assembly.


The Speaker, Olamide Oladiji, commended the former deputy speaker and the erstwhile majority leader for their maturity.

He said: “He (Akinruntan) has been a peaceful ally. He has support the house. I want to appreciate him for the maturity displayed for ensuring a peaceful transition.

“The same thing goes to the former majority leader. He has been a stabilizer in the House and also a good and dependable ally.”


It was gathered that the change of the positions of the principal officers became imperative in order to balance the unwritten elective political arrangements in the state.

Akinruntan and Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa hail from the same Ilaje Local Council Area of the state, while the erstwhile Majority Leader, Ogunmolasuyi is from
Owo Local Council, where the Deputy Governor, Olayide Adelami hails from.




Mokwa death toll rises as NSEMA recovers five more bodies, totaling 158
Discover
Suspected herdsmen hijack fully loaded vehicle, kill driver, abduct passengers in Benue
Discover
Cardizoom
|
Sponsored by Taboola
I don't get sick because I clean my blood vessels. Write down the recipe
Read More
Skip
Nnamdi Kanu: Monday sit-at-home had nothing to do with death of Jonathan’s ex-aide, Gulak – IPOB
Discover
Terrorism: Nnamdi Kanu confirmed he ordered Tinubu, Wike to be killed – DSS tells Court
Discover

BREAKING: Court Strikes Out DSS Video and Written Statements in Nnamdi Kanu Trial 

In a significant development, the Federal High Court in Abuja has ruled that video recordings and written statements obtained by the Department of State Services (DSS) from Nnamdi Kanu in 2015 are inadmissible as evidence. 

Justice James Omotosho delivered the ruling on May 29, 2025, following a trial-within-trial to determine the voluntariness of the statements. The court found that the absence of Kanu’s legal counsel during the DSS interrogations violated Section 15 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), which mandates that a suspect’s statement must be obtained in the presence of their lawyer or a legal representative.  

The judge emphasized that, despite the prosecution’s argument that the interviews appeared cordial, the legal requirement for counsel presence is paramount. Consequently, the court expunged the video recordings and written statements from the record. 

This ruling marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing trial of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, potentially impacting the prosecution’s case moving forward. 

#NnamdiKanu #IPOB #FederalHighCourt #DSS #HumanRights

JUST IN: DSS Witness Shocks Court: “We Treat Nnamdi Kanu Like a President”

In a surprising revelation during court proceedings, a Department of State Services (DSS) witness testified that Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), is being given what was described as “presidential treatment” while in custody.

The disclosure came during a trial-within-a-trial on the admissibility of Kanu’s statements, where his legal team alleged he was subjected to inhumane conditions. However, the DSS witness countered, stating that Kanu enjoys special privileges, including a well-furnished private space, choice meals, medical care, and extended visitation rights — privileges not typically afforded to regular detainees.

This development has sparked debate across social media, with supporters divided over whether the statement reflects genuine care or an attempt to counter allegations of mistreatment.

The court case continues, as both sides present contrasting narratives over the conditions of Kanu’s detention.

#NnamdiKanu #DSS #IPOB #PresidentialTreatment

Nnamdi Kanu Alleges DSS Coerced Confessional Statements in 2015

Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has testified that operatives of Nigeria’s Department of State Services (DSS) coerced him into making confessional statements following his 2015 arrest.

During a trial-within-a-trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja on May 28, 2025, Kanu claimed that upon his arrest in Lagos, he was chained, blindfolded, and transported to Abuja without knowledge of his destination. He alleged that he was held in solitary confinement without light and denied access to legal counsel. Kanu further stated that a DSS officer, identified as Mr. Brown, threatened to withhold his daily hour of fresh air—recommended due to health concerns—unless he cooperated during interrogations.  

The prosecution presented video recordings and written statements purportedly made by Kanu during his detention. However, Kanu’s defense team objected to their admissibility, arguing that they were obtained under duress and without legal representation.  

The DSS maintains that Kanu’s statements were made voluntarily, denying any misconduct. Justice James Omotosho has ordered a trial-within-a-trial to determine the voluntariness of the statements.

#NnamdiKanu #IPOB #DSS

Alleged Terrorism: Court Admits Video of Kanu Inspecting Radio Biafra Transmitter

The Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted into evidence three video clips, including one showing Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), inspecting a radio transmitter allegedly smuggled into Nigeria.

During the proceedings, Kanu reportedly acknowledged being the founder and director of Radio Biafra, the platform at the center of the controversy.