• No, Coca-Cola Did Not Invent Christmas — Here’s the Real Story

    Christmas was not created by one person. It developed over time as a Christian celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. In the early days, Christians did not celebrate Jesus’ birthday. It was around the 4th century (about AD 336) that Christian leaders in Rome chose December 25 as the date to mark His birth. The date likely aligned with popular Roman festivals at the time, helping Christianity gain wider acceptance.

    Coca-Cola came much later, in 1886. What the company influenced was the modern image of Santa Claus, especially the red-and-white outfit made popular through advertisements in the 1930s. Coca-Cola did not invent Christmas.

    Simply put, Jesus Christ is the reason for Christmas. The Church formally established the celebration, and no individual or company created it.

    #ChristmasFacts #FaithAndHistory #TruthMatters #Culture
    No, Coca-Cola Did Not Invent Christmas — Here’s the Real Story Christmas was not created by one person. It developed over time as a Christian celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. In the early days, Christians did not celebrate Jesus’ birthday. It was around the 4th century (about AD 336) that Christian leaders in Rome chose December 25 as the date to mark His birth. The date likely aligned with popular Roman festivals at the time, helping Christianity gain wider acceptance. Coca-Cola came much later, in 1886. What the company influenced was the modern image of Santa Claus, especially the red-and-white outfit made popular through advertisements in the 1930s. Coca-Cola did not invent Christmas. Simply put, Jesus Christ is the reason for Christmas. The Church formally established the celebration, and no individual or company created it. #ChristmasFacts #FaithAndHistory #TruthMatters #Culture
    love
    1
    · 0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·552 Views
  • The Imam of Umar Ibn Al-Khattab Masjid in Morocco passed away on a blessed Friday while delivering the Khutbah, speaking profoundly about the reality of the afterlife and the certainty of death. In a moment that deeply moved worshippers, he paused his sermon, appeared to sense his final moments, and began reciting the Kalimah-e-Shahada, the ultimate declaration of faith for every Muslim. His passing in the house of Allah, during worship, stands as a powerful reminder of life’s purpose and the truth of the Hereafter. May Allah forgive his shortcomings, elevate his ranks, and grant him Jannat-ul-Firdaus. Ameen. #islamic #islam #Muslims #muslim
    The Imam of Umar Ibn Al-Khattab Masjid in Morocco passed away on a blessed Friday while delivering the Khutbah, speaking profoundly about the reality of the afterlife and the certainty of death. In a moment that deeply moved worshippers, he paused his sermon, appeared to sense his final moments, and began reciting the Kalimah-e-Shahada, the ultimate declaration of faith for every Muslim. His passing in the house of Allah, during worship, stands as a powerful reminder of life’s purpose and the truth of the Hereafter. May Allah forgive his shortcomings, elevate his ranks, and grant him Jannat-ul-Firdaus. Ameen. #islamic #islam #Muslims #muslim
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·381 Views
  • Massive Crowd in Katsina as Over 3 Million Tijaniyya Faithful Attend 40th National Maulud

    Millions of Tijaniyya followers from Nigeria and other African countries converged on Katsina State for the 40th National Maulud in honour of Sheikh Ibrahim Nyass. Held at the Muhammadu Dikko Stadium, the event filled the venue to capacity, spilling onto surrounding roads as worshippers arrived early. Religious leaders and government officials offered prayers for peace, unity and stability in Katsina and Nigeria. The gathering also boosted local businesses, with traders recording high sales as visitors flooded the city.

    #KatsinaMaulud #Tijaniyya #NigeriaNews
    Massive Crowd in Katsina as Over 3 Million Tijaniyya Faithful Attend 40th National Maulud Millions of Tijaniyya followers from Nigeria and other African countries converged on Katsina State for the 40th National Maulud in honour of Sheikh Ibrahim Nyass. Held at the Muhammadu Dikko Stadium, the event filled the venue to capacity, spilling onto surrounding roads as worshippers arrived early. Religious leaders and government officials offered prayers for peace, unity and stability in Katsina and Nigeria. The gathering also boosted local businesses, with traders recording high sales as visitors flooded the city. #KatsinaMaulud #Tijaniyya #NigeriaNews
    love
    1
    · 0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·484 Views
  • Chief Imam Abdullahi Abubakar, Hero Who Sheltered Christians During 2018 Plateau Killings, Dies at 92

    Chief Imam Abdullahi Abubakar of Nghar village, Barkin Ladi LGA, Plateau State, has died at 92. The cleric gained national and international recognition for courageously sheltering over 260 Christians during the deadly 2018 attacks, protecting them from armed assailants. Honoured with Nigeria’s Member of the Order of the Niger (MON) and the US International Religious Freedom Award, Abubakar became a symbol of interfaith unity and humanity. Plateau Governor Caleb Mutfwang described his death as a significant loss, urging residents to uphold his legacy of compassion, peace, and solidarity.
    Chief Imam Abdullahi Abubakar, Hero Who Sheltered Christians During 2018 Plateau Killings, Dies at 92 Chief Imam Abdullahi Abubakar of Nghar village, Barkin Ladi LGA, Plateau State, has died at 92. The cleric gained national and international recognition for courageously sheltering over 260 Christians during the deadly 2018 attacks, protecting them from armed assailants. Honoured with Nigeria’s Member of the Order of the Niger (MON) and the US International Religious Freedom Award, Abubakar became a symbol of interfaith unity and humanity. Plateau Governor Caleb Mutfwang described his death as a significant loss, urging residents to uphold his legacy of compassion, peace, and solidarity.
    1 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·587 Views
  • Today Is My Last Day as a Christian Catholic Man Reacts to Ifeanyi Ubah’s Omission at Nnewi Cathedral Dedication

    A Catholic man from Nnewi, James Louise Okoye, has sparked intense debate after publicly renouncing Christianity over the Catholic Church’s failure to acknowledge the late Senator Ifeanyi Ubah during the dedication of the Nnewi Catholic Diocese Cathedral.

    In a viral video recorded within the church compound, Okoye expressed deep anger and disappointment, questioning why Ubah—whom he described as a major contributor and pioneer supporter of the cathedral project—was not mentioned during prayers for the faithful departed.

    “Did you hear them say, ‘May the soul of Ifeanyi Ubah rest in peace’?” he asked those around him.

    According to Okoye, the omission was unfair and painful, especially given Ubah’s alleged role in supporting the cathedral before his death. He described the silence as injustice, repeatedly saying, “Evil is evil.”

    Visibly emotional, Okoye apologised to Ubah’s spirit in Igbo, repeatedly saying, “Ifeanyi Ubah, sorry.”
    He then made a shocking declaration:
    “I’m done with religion. Today is my last day as a Christian.”

    Should the Church have acknowledged Ifeanyi Ubah?
    Was this a justified protest or an emotional overreaction?

    #IfeanyiUbah #CatholicChurch #Nnewi #NigeriaNews
    Today Is My Last Day as a Christian Catholic Man Reacts to Ifeanyi Ubah’s Omission at Nnewi Cathedral Dedication A Catholic man from Nnewi, James Louise Okoye, has sparked intense debate after publicly renouncing Christianity over the Catholic Church’s failure to acknowledge the late Senator Ifeanyi Ubah during the dedication of the Nnewi Catholic Diocese Cathedral. In a viral video recorded within the church compound, Okoye expressed deep anger and disappointment, questioning why Ubah—whom he described as a major contributor and pioneer supporter of the cathedral project—was not mentioned during prayers for the faithful departed. “Did you hear them say, ‘May the soul of Ifeanyi Ubah rest in peace’?” he asked those around him. According to Okoye, the omission was unfair and painful, especially given Ubah’s alleged role in supporting the cathedral before his death. He described the silence as injustice, repeatedly saying, “Evil is evil.” Visibly emotional, Okoye apologised to Ubah’s spirit in Igbo, repeatedly saying, “Ifeanyi Ubah, sorry.” He then made a shocking declaration: “I’m done with religion. Today is my last day as a Christian.” 👉 Should the Church have acknowledged Ifeanyi Ubah? 👉 Was this a justified protest or an emotional overreaction? #IfeanyiUbah #CatholicChurch #Nnewi #NigeriaNews
    love
    1
    · 0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·388 Views
  • Omo, Gospel World Don Lose! Omije Ojumi Don Pass On Lagos – Fans In Total Shock

    Na serious gbege for Nigerian gospel music community as Evangelist Olubunmi Akinnaanu Adeoye, popularly known as Omije Ojumi, don die. She waka go her rest on Monday, January 12, 2026, at a Lagos hospital after small illness, aged 46 years.

    Omije Ojumi na correct gospel singer and evangelist wey her songs dey inspire hope, faith, perseverance, and pure reliance on God. Hits like Dabira and Alatilehin don touch plenty lives, especially among Yoruba Christian congregations.

    Plenty gospel artistes, church leaders, and fans don dey social media dey mourn her, remember her ministry and the way she dey use music win souls. Family don appreciate all prayers and support during this difficult time.

    Her death na big loss, but her music and ministry go still dey live for hearts of those she touch.

    Omo, Gospel World Don Lose! Omije Ojumi Don Pass On Lagos – Fans In Total Shock Na serious gbege for Nigerian gospel music community as Evangelist Olubunmi Akinnaanu Adeoye, popularly known as Omije Ojumi, don die. She waka go her rest on Monday, January 12, 2026, at a Lagos hospital after small illness, aged 46 years. Omije Ojumi na correct gospel singer and evangelist wey her songs dey inspire hope, faith, perseverance, and pure reliance on God. Hits like Dabira and Alatilehin don touch plenty lives, especially among Yoruba Christian congregations. Plenty gospel artistes, church leaders, and fans don dey social media dey mourn her, remember her ministry and the way she dey use music win souls. Family don appreciate all prayers and support during this difficult time. Her death na big loss, but her music and ministry go still dey live for hearts of those she touch.
    love
    1
    · 0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·461 Views
  • How many of you know this man? He is prophet Primate Elijah Ayodele. He once prophesied that playing Lookman and Osimhen at AFCON would cause Nigeria serious problems.
    The “problem” is not even the prophecy anymore. The real problem is that both players have gone on to win Man of the Match, they are among the top contenders for highest goal scorer, they have driven the team into the semi-finals, and at this rate, Nigeria might even win the AFCON with them leading the charge. Football said, “let me correct this gently.”
    So, let’s not talk too much… because some of you watching AFCON right now are the same people who refused to marry the love of your life because a prophet said no. Some abandoned their marriages, families, and children because “prophet said.” Others closed businesses, rejected opportunities, and walked away from progress all in the name of prophecy. Hope you are watching the matches well, sha.
    Let me even help the prophet small, maybe the prophecy was misunderstood. Maybe it was not football “problem.” Maybe it was the problem of defenders facing Osimhen. Or the problem of goalkeepers dealing with Lookman. Because clearly, somebody is suffering and it’s not Nigeria.
    The lesson is simple: be careful with prophecies. Faith is good, but blind dependence is dangerous. If your entire life is controlled by “prophet said,” evidence will one day embarrass you publicly just like this AFCON is doing now.
    ~`LAW Parlour
    How many of you know this man? He is prophet Primate Elijah Ayodele. He once prophesied that playing Lookman and Osimhen at AFCON would cause Nigeria serious problems. The “problem” is not even the prophecy anymore. The real problem is that both players have gone on to win Man of the Match, they are among the top contenders for highest goal scorer, they have driven the team into the semi-finals, and at this rate, Nigeria might even win the AFCON with them leading the charge. Football said, “let me correct this gently.” So, let’s not talk too much… because some of you watching AFCON right now are the same people who refused to marry the love of your life because a prophet said no. Some abandoned their marriages, families, and children because “prophet said.” Others closed businesses, rejected opportunities, and walked away from progress all in the name of prophecy. Hope you are watching the matches well, sha. Let me even help the prophet small, maybe the prophecy was misunderstood. Maybe it was not football “problem.” Maybe it was the problem of defenders facing Osimhen. Or the problem of goalkeepers dealing with Lookman. Because clearly, somebody is suffering and it’s not Nigeria. The lesson is simple: be careful with prophecies. Faith is good, but blind dependence is dangerous. If your entire life is controlled by “prophet said,” evidence will one day embarrass you publicly just like this AFCON is doing now. ~`LAW Parlour
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·407 Views
  • KEY THINGS PEOPLE IGNORE BEFORE MARRIAGE
    1. Communication Style
    How you talk during peace is different from how you talk during conflict.
    2. Conflict Resolution
    Do you resolve issues or sweep them under the carpet?
    3. Money Mindset
    Spending habits, debt, saving culture, and financial transparency.
    4. Emotional Maturity
    Can your partner apologize, accept correction, and take responsibility?
    5. Expectations in Marriage
    Roles, responsibilities, lifestyle, and standards.
    6. Family Boundaries & In-Laws
    Who comes first — spouse or parents?
    7. Values & Beliefs
    Faith, morals, principles, and life priorities.
    8. Life Goals & Direction
    Career plans, relocation, children, and long-term vision.
    9. Anger & Temperament
    How your partner reacts when upset or stressed.
    10. Respect (Not Just Love)
    Love can fade temporarily, but respect must remain constant.
    11. Handling Stress & Pressure
    How they act during hardship, not comfort.
    12. Sexual Expectations & Intimacy
    Needs, boundaries, and openness (without details).
    13. Health & Genetics
    Physical, mental health history, and genotype discussions.
    14. Past Trauma & Baggage
    Unhealed wounds can show up in marriage.
    15. Parenting Style
    Discipline, education, and values for children.
    16. Friendships & Influences
    Who has access and influence over your partner?
    17. Honesty & Transparency
    Secrets before marriage often become scandals after.
    18. Growth Mindset
    Are you both willing to learn and change?
    19. Decision-Making Style
    Who decides what, and how?
    20. Definition of Love & Commitment
    What does cheating, loyalty, and commitment mean to each of you?
    🔑 KEY THINGS PEOPLE IGNORE BEFORE MARRIAGE 1. Communication Style How you talk during peace is different from how you talk during conflict. 2. Conflict Resolution Do you resolve issues or sweep them under the carpet? 3. Money Mindset Spending habits, debt, saving culture, and financial transparency. 4. Emotional Maturity Can your partner apologize, accept correction, and take responsibility? 5. Expectations in Marriage Roles, responsibilities, lifestyle, and standards. 6. Family Boundaries & In-Laws Who comes first — spouse or parents? 7. Values & Beliefs Faith, morals, principles, and life priorities. 8. Life Goals & Direction Career plans, relocation, children, and long-term vision. 9. Anger & Temperament How your partner reacts when upset or stressed. 10. Respect (Not Just Love) Love can fade temporarily, but respect must remain constant. 11. Handling Stress & Pressure How they act during hardship, not comfort. 12. Sexual Expectations & Intimacy Needs, boundaries, and openness (without details). 13. Health & Genetics Physical, mental health history, and genotype discussions. 14. Past Trauma & Baggage Unhealed wounds can show up in marriage. 15. Parenting Style Discipline, education, and values for children. 16. Friendships & Influences Who has access and influence over your partner? 17. Honesty & Transparency Secrets before marriage often become scandals after. 18. Growth Mindset Are you both willing to learn and change? 19. Decision-Making Style Who decides what, and how? 20. Definition of Love & Commitment What does cheating, loyalty, and commitment mean to each of you?
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·754 Views
  • The BBC is set to release a 3-part investigative documentary alleging decades of abuse, sexual crimes, manipulation, and cover-ups linked to the late founder of SCOAN, TB Joshua.

    According to the BBC, more than 30 former members and workers described a hidden world of intimidation, rape, staged miracles, and silence enforced through fear and money. Some allege the abuse began when they were teenagers, continued for years, and was justified to them as being “for their salvation.”

    The documentary also reopens wounds from the 2014 SCOAN guesthouse collapse, where over 100 people died. Former insiders claim the church knew the building was structurally unsafe, ignored professional warnings, and later misled members with a false aircraft-bombing narrative. Families reportedly received cash payments allegedly meant to keep them quiet.

    Survivors say miracles were scripted, suffering was exaggerated for TV, and dissent was punished. Even TB Joshua’s own daughter reportedly says she was beaten, isolated, and thrown out after questioning allegations against him.

    With international figures, former disciples, and victims now speaking openly, many are asking uncomfortable questions Nigeria avoided while TB Joshua was alive.

    If these allegations were known for years, why was nothing done?
    Was this faith, power, or a carefully protected system of abuse?
    And should religious institutions be beyond scrutiny simply because of miracles and popularity?

    The BBC will air the documentary over three consecutive weeks.

    What’s your take — truth finally coming out, or another controversy too late?

    #TBJoshua #BBCDocumentary #SCOAN #FaithAndAccountability
    The BBC is set to release a 3-part investigative documentary alleging decades of abuse, sexual crimes, manipulation, and cover-ups linked to the late founder of SCOAN, TB Joshua. According to the BBC, more than 30 former members and workers described a hidden world of intimidation, rape, staged miracles, and silence enforced through fear and money. Some allege the abuse began when they were teenagers, continued for years, and was justified to them as being “for their salvation.” The documentary also reopens wounds from the 2014 SCOAN guesthouse collapse, where over 100 people died. Former insiders claim the church knew the building was structurally unsafe, ignored professional warnings, and later misled members with a false aircraft-bombing narrative. Families reportedly received cash payments allegedly meant to keep them quiet. Survivors say miracles were scripted, suffering was exaggerated for TV, and dissent was punished. Even TB Joshua’s own daughter reportedly says she was beaten, isolated, and thrown out after questioning allegations against him. With international figures, former disciples, and victims now speaking openly, many are asking uncomfortable questions Nigeria avoided while TB Joshua was alive. If these allegations were known for years, why was nothing done? Was this faith, power, or a carefully protected system of abuse? And should religious institutions be beyond scrutiny simply because of miracles and popularity? The BBC will air the documentary over three consecutive weeks. What’s your take — truth finally coming out, or another controversy too late? #TBJoshua #BBCDocumentary #SCOAN #FaithAndAccountability
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·781 Views
  • Is Nnamdi Kanu Being Illegally Detained? Nigerian Jewish Leader Visits IPOB Founder in Sokoto Prison, Rejects Terrorism Label and Demands His Immediate Release

    Is the continued detention of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), legally justified—or is it a violation of justice and human rights? This question has been reignited following a high-profile prison visit by Kohen Daniel Onuoha, a Nigerian Jewish cleric and spiritual leader of the Peace of Yahweh Synagogue and founder of Eastern Judaism, who met Kanu at the Sokoto Correctional Facility on January 10, 2026.

    Describing the visit as an act of spiritual and moral solidarity, Onuoha said he was accompanied by his wife and representatives of Jewish congregations in Nigeria’s former Eastern Region, whom he said “faithfully observe the Ten Commandments.” According to him, the visit symbolised years of prayers and sacrifices by his community for Kanu’s freedom.

    “For over five years, we have remained steadfast in daily sacrifices and prayers to Elohim without interruption,” Onuoha said, adding that the prison visit reaffirmed his commitment to justice and liberty.

    During the visit, the cleric directly challenged the legal foundation of Kanu’s continued incarceration, urging the international community, legal experts, and human rights organisations to examine what he described as questionable legal grounds for the case. He argued that Kanu’s prosecution was based on a repealed law, making the detention unlawful.

    Onuoha also rejected the designation of Kanu and IPOB as terrorists, insisting that neither the separatist leader nor the movement had committed violent acts. “Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is not a terrorist, and IPOB is not a terrorist organisation,” he declared, adding that Kanu’s ordeal stemmed from the peaceful exercise of self-determination and his public criticism of alleged abuses by political elites, foreign interests, and local power structures.

    He further contended that speech alone cannot justify criminal conviction, stressing that verbal expressions or broadcasts without evidence of violence should not result in imprisonment. Calling for Kanu’s “immediate and unconditional release,” the Jewish leader said such action was necessary to uphold justice and the rule of law.

    Beyond Kanu’s case, Onuoha appealed for broader international intervention, arguing that Biafrans continue to face marginalisation, oppression, and violence. He commended U.S. President Donald Trump for what he described as efforts to protect Christians in Nigeria and urged increased global pressure on Nigerian authorities over alleged human rights violations.

    In his closing remarks, Onuoha called on Kanu’s supporters, Biafrans, Jews, and human rights advocates to remain peaceful, resilient, and steadfast, expressing confidence that justice would ultimately prevail.

    The visit raises urgent questions: Is Nnamdi Kanu’s detention legally valid? Has the terrorism label been misapplied? And will international scrutiny finally force a reassessment of one of Nigeria’s most controversial political prosecutions?

    Is Nnamdi Kanu Being Illegally Detained? Nigerian Jewish Leader Visits IPOB Founder in Sokoto Prison, Rejects Terrorism Label and Demands His Immediate Release Is the continued detention of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), legally justified—or is it a violation of justice and human rights? This question has been reignited following a high-profile prison visit by Kohen Daniel Onuoha, a Nigerian Jewish cleric and spiritual leader of the Peace of Yahweh Synagogue and founder of Eastern Judaism, who met Kanu at the Sokoto Correctional Facility on January 10, 2026. Describing the visit as an act of spiritual and moral solidarity, Onuoha said he was accompanied by his wife and representatives of Jewish congregations in Nigeria’s former Eastern Region, whom he said “faithfully observe the Ten Commandments.” According to him, the visit symbolised years of prayers and sacrifices by his community for Kanu’s freedom. “For over five years, we have remained steadfast in daily sacrifices and prayers to Elohim without interruption,” Onuoha said, adding that the prison visit reaffirmed his commitment to justice and liberty. During the visit, the cleric directly challenged the legal foundation of Kanu’s continued incarceration, urging the international community, legal experts, and human rights organisations to examine what he described as questionable legal grounds for the case. He argued that Kanu’s prosecution was based on a repealed law, making the detention unlawful. Onuoha also rejected the designation of Kanu and IPOB as terrorists, insisting that neither the separatist leader nor the movement had committed violent acts. “Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is not a terrorist, and IPOB is not a terrorist organisation,” he declared, adding that Kanu’s ordeal stemmed from the peaceful exercise of self-determination and his public criticism of alleged abuses by political elites, foreign interests, and local power structures. He further contended that speech alone cannot justify criminal conviction, stressing that verbal expressions or broadcasts without evidence of violence should not result in imprisonment. Calling for Kanu’s “immediate and unconditional release,” the Jewish leader said such action was necessary to uphold justice and the rule of law. Beyond Kanu’s case, Onuoha appealed for broader international intervention, arguing that Biafrans continue to face marginalisation, oppression, and violence. He commended U.S. President Donald Trump for what he described as efforts to protect Christians in Nigeria and urged increased global pressure on Nigerian authorities over alleged human rights violations. In his closing remarks, Onuoha called on Kanu’s supporters, Biafrans, Jews, and human rights advocates to remain peaceful, resilient, and steadfast, expressing confidence that justice would ultimately prevail. The visit raises urgent questions: Is Nnamdi Kanu’s detention legally valid? Has the terrorism label been misapplied? And will international scrutiny finally force a reassessment of one of Nigeria’s most controversial political prosecutions?
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·956 Views
  • We strongly condemn the reckless and inappropriate statement shared by Raye. Encouraging people to strip naked under the guise of faith is irresponsible, misleading, and potentially harmful. Spiritual beliefs should never be used to promote actions that can confuse, endanger, or exploit vulnerable individuals.
    We strongly condemn the reckless and inappropriate statement shared by Raye. Encouraging people to strip naked under the guise of faith is irresponsible, misleading, and potentially harmful. Spiritual beliefs should never be used to promote actions that can confuse, endanger, or exploit vulnerable individuals.
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·424 Views
  • “Strip Yourself Naked and Pray by Midnight” — Raye Sparks Debate on X Over Controversial Faith Advice

    Internet personality Raye has ignited widespread debate on X after sharing a controversial opinion on prayer and spirituality.

    In a post that quickly drew attention, Raye advised people to strip themselves naked and pray by midnight, claiming that with enough faith, there is nothing one could ask for that heaven would ignore.

    The statement triggered mixed reactions online, with many users questioning the approach and criticizing the message, while others defended her right to express her personal spiritual beliefs.

    Amid the backlash, Raye issued a follow-up post clarifying that no one is obligated to pray or believe the way she does. She noted that religion can sound “crazy” rather than logical when broken down and over-analysed.

    According to her, faith should not always be approached from a purely logical standpoint, adding that people should simply practice what works for them spiritually and move on if they disagree.
    “Strip Yourself Naked and Pray by Midnight” — Raye Sparks Debate on X Over Controversial Faith Advice Internet personality Raye has ignited widespread debate on X after sharing a controversial opinion on prayer and spirituality. In a post that quickly drew attention, Raye advised people to strip themselves naked and pray by midnight, claiming that with enough faith, there is nothing one could ask for that heaven would ignore. The statement triggered mixed reactions online, with many users questioning the approach and criticizing the message, while others defended her right to express her personal spiritual beliefs. Amid the backlash, Raye issued a follow-up post clarifying that no one is obligated to pray or believe the way she does. She noted that religion can sound “crazy” rather than logical when broken down and over-analysed. According to her, faith should not always be approached from a purely logical standpoint, adding that people should simply practice what works for them spiritually and move on if they disagree.
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·500 Views
  • Is Abortion ‘Fake Compassion’? Why Pope Leo’s First Major Vatican Speech Condemning Abortion, Surrogacy and Euthanasia Is Reigniting a Global Moral Debate

    Is the world redefining compassion in a way that undermines human dignity? In his first major address at the Vatican, Pope Leo has taken a firm stance against abortion, surrogacy, and euthanasia, branding them as practices that distort the true meaning of compassion and threaten the sanctity of human life.

    Speaking on issues ranging from justice and prisoners’ rights to family life and the protection of vulnerable groups, the new pontiff described abortion as a direct rejection of life, stating that it “cuts short a growing life and refuses to welcome the gift of life.” He warned against what he called “deceptive forms of compassion” promoted by modern societies, arguing that true compassion must defend life rather than eliminate it.

    Pope Leo framed his message within a broader reflection on human dignity, emphasizing that human beings are created in the image and likeness of God and are called to love. According to him, this calling finds its clearest expression within the family—an institution he said is now under sustained pressure worldwide. He identified two major challenges facing families today: neglect by international systems and the rise of fragile, broken households afflicted by internal struggles, including domestic violence.

    Stressing the moral responsibility toward unborn children, the Pope said the union between a man and a woman carries an ethical obligation to protect life. He condemned growing international efforts to expand access to abortion across borders, expressing deep concern over projects that fund “cross-border mobility” for what he described as the “so-called right to safe abortion.” He called it “deplorable” that public resources are used to suppress life rather than support mothers and families, insisting that governments should prioritize protecting unborn children while providing concrete assistance to women facing difficult pregnancies.

    Beyond abortion, Pope Leo also denounced surrogacy, describing it as a practice that strips both women and children of dignity by turning pregnancy into a negotiable service. He argued that such arrangements reduce children to commodities and exploit women’s bodies, distorting the natural and relational foundation of the family.

    The pontiff further criticized euthanasia, again labeling it a misleading form of compassion, and urged states to invest in palliative care and authentic solidarity instead of policies that hasten death. In the same address, he spoke out on prisoners’ rights, political detainees, migrants, and the abolition of the death penalty, which he described as a punishment that “destroys all hope of forgiveness and renewal.”

    The speech marks the clearest articulation yet of Pope Leo’s moral priorities and signals what many observers see as a continuation—and possible intensification—of the Vatican’s opposition to abortion, surrogacy, and euthanasia. As governments, activists, and faith communities worldwide remain sharply divided on reproductive rights and end-of-life policies, the Pope’s remarks have reignited a global conversation: Is modern society redefining compassion in ways that contradict the protection of life, or is the Vatican standing against changing realities of human rights and personal choice?


    Is Abortion ‘Fake Compassion’? Why Pope Leo’s First Major Vatican Speech Condemning Abortion, Surrogacy and Euthanasia Is Reigniting a Global Moral Debate Is the world redefining compassion in a way that undermines human dignity? In his first major address at the Vatican, Pope Leo has taken a firm stance against abortion, surrogacy, and euthanasia, branding them as practices that distort the true meaning of compassion and threaten the sanctity of human life. Speaking on issues ranging from justice and prisoners’ rights to family life and the protection of vulnerable groups, the new pontiff described abortion as a direct rejection of life, stating that it “cuts short a growing life and refuses to welcome the gift of life.” He warned against what he called “deceptive forms of compassion” promoted by modern societies, arguing that true compassion must defend life rather than eliminate it. Pope Leo framed his message within a broader reflection on human dignity, emphasizing that human beings are created in the image and likeness of God and are called to love. According to him, this calling finds its clearest expression within the family—an institution he said is now under sustained pressure worldwide. He identified two major challenges facing families today: neglect by international systems and the rise of fragile, broken households afflicted by internal struggles, including domestic violence. Stressing the moral responsibility toward unborn children, the Pope said the union between a man and a woman carries an ethical obligation to protect life. He condemned growing international efforts to expand access to abortion across borders, expressing deep concern over projects that fund “cross-border mobility” for what he described as the “so-called right to safe abortion.” He called it “deplorable” that public resources are used to suppress life rather than support mothers and families, insisting that governments should prioritize protecting unborn children while providing concrete assistance to women facing difficult pregnancies. Beyond abortion, Pope Leo also denounced surrogacy, describing it as a practice that strips both women and children of dignity by turning pregnancy into a negotiable service. He argued that such arrangements reduce children to commodities and exploit women’s bodies, distorting the natural and relational foundation of the family. The pontiff further criticized euthanasia, again labeling it a misleading form of compassion, and urged states to invest in palliative care and authentic solidarity instead of policies that hasten death. In the same address, he spoke out on prisoners’ rights, political detainees, migrants, and the abolition of the death penalty, which he described as a punishment that “destroys all hope of forgiveness and renewal.” The speech marks the clearest articulation yet of Pope Leo’s moral priorities and signals what many observers see as a continuation—and possible intensification—of the Vatican’s opposition to abortion, surrogacy, and euthanasia. As governments, activists, and faith communities worldwide remain sharply divided on reproductive rights and end-of-life policies, the Pope’s remarks have reignited a global conversation: Is modern society redefining compassion in ways that contradict the protection of life, or is the Vatican standing against changing realities of human rights and personal choice?
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·625 Views
  • Is the ‘Christian Genocide’ in Nigeria a Political Narrative? Why Trump Admits Muslims Are Also Killed as Sowore Accuses the U.S. of Using Religion to Justify Power, Oil, and Military Influence

    Is the narrative of a “Christian genocide” in Nigeria an honest reflection of the country’s security crisis—or a political tool shaped by foreign interests? United States President Donald Trump has made a partial shift in his long-standing rhetoric on religious violence in Nigeria, acknowledging that Muslims are also being killed, even while maintaining that Christians remain the primary victims.

    Trump made the remarks during an interview with The New York Times following questions about Washington’s Christmas Day military strike in northwest Nigeria. The U.S. military said the operation, carried out at the request of the Nigerian government, targeted Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), a Boko Haram splinter group responsible for years of deadly attacks across northern Nigeria.

    When asked about earlier comments from his own Africa adviser—who had stated that extremist groups in Nigeria kill more Muslims than Christians—Trump responded: “I think that Muslims are being killed also in Nigeria. But it’s mostly Christians.” The statement marked a rare acknowledgment that Nigeria’s victims of terrorism cut across religious lines, even as Trump continued to frame the conflict primarily through a Christian persecution lens.

    The comments immediately drew a sharp response from Omoyele Sowore, former Nigerian presidential candidate and prominent human rights activist. In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), Sowore dismissed the “Christian genocide” narrative as a calculated political construct, arguing that it is designed to stir emotion, mobilize conservative audiences abroad, and provide moral cover for foreign military, economic, and geopolitical agendas.

    Sowore accused Trump of using religion as a rhetorical device while pursuing what he described as imperial interests tied to oil, rare earth minerals, and strategic dominance. “The narrative used to justify it is secondary,” Sowore wrote, adding that such framing only needs to “match the gullibility of the intended audience.” According to him, claims of systematic religious genocide in Nigeria are not grounded in objective reality but are deliberately shaped to occupy a powerful emotional space in Western political discourse.

    He further challenged Trump’s moral authority to speak on Christian values, asserting that the former U.S. president does not embody the compassion, humility, or solidarity central to the faith he frequently invokes. Sowore argued that Trump’s selective concern for religious identity masks a broader indifference to human suffering—both abroad and at home—unless it aligns with his political interests.

    The controversy highlights a deeper question: Is Nigeria’s complex security crisis being oversimplified into a religious conflict for international consumption? While jihadist groups like ISWAP and Boko Haram have undeniably targeted Christian communities, they have also killed thousands of Muslims, including traditional leaders, clerics, villagers, and security personnel. Analysts have long warned that framing the violence as exclusively anti-Christian risks distorting reality, inflaming sectarian tensions, and obscuring the political, economic, and territorial dimensions of the conflict.

    Trump’s admission that Muslims are also victims, even if partial, challenges his earlier absolutist framing. Yet his insistence that Christians remain the main targets continues to fuel debate about whether U.S. policy toward Nigeria is being shaped by faith-based narratives rather than nuanced security analysis.

    As Nigeria battles insurgency, banditry, and transnational terrorism, the exchange between Trump and Sowore underscores how global power politics, religious identity, and media narratives intersect in shaping international responses to African conflicts. The key question remains: is the world seeing Nigeria’s crisis as it truly is—or as it is most politically useful to portray?


    Is the ‘Christian Genocide’ in Nigeria a Political Narrative? Why Trump Admits Muslims Are Also Killed as Sowore Accuses the U.S. of Using Religion to Justify Power, Oil, and Military Influence Is the narrative of a “Christian genocide” in Nigeria an honest reflection of the country’s security crisis—or a political tool shaped by foreign interests? United States President Donald Trump has made a partial shift in his long-standing rhetoric on religious violence in Nigeria, acknowledging that Muslims are also being killed, even while maintaining that Christians remain the primary victims. Trump made the remarks during an interview with The New York Times following questions about Washington’s Christmas Day military strike in northwest Nigeria. The U.S. military said the operation, carried out at the request of the Nigerian government, targeted Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), a Boko Haram splinter group responsible for years of deadly attacks across northern Nigeria. When asked about earlier comments from his own Africa adviser—who had stated that extremist groups in Nigeria kill more Muslims than Christians—Trump responded: “I think that Muslims are being killed also in Nigeria. But it’s mostly Christians.” The statement marked a rare acknowledgment that Nigeria’s victims of terrorism cut across religious lines, even as Trump continued to frame the conflict primarily through a Christian persecution lens. The comments immediately drew a sharp response from Omoyele Sowore, former Nigerian presidential candidate and prominent human rights activist. In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), Sowore dismissed the “Christian genocide” narrative as a calculated political construct, arguing that it is designed to stir emotion, mobilize conservative audiences abroad, and provide moral cover for foreign military, economic, and geopolitical agendas. Sowore accused Trump of using religion as a rhetorical device while pursuing what he described as imperial interests tied to oil, rare earth minerals, and strategic dominance. “The narrative used to justify it is secondary,” Sowore wrote, adding that such framing only needs to “match the gullibility of the intended audience.” According to him, claims of systematic religious genocide in Nigeria are not grounded in objective reality but are deliberately shaped to occupy a powerful emotional space in Western political discourse. He further challenged Trump’s moral authority to speak on Christian values, asserting that the former U.S. president does not embody the compassion, humility, or solidarity central to the faith he frequently invokes. Sowore argued that Trump’s selective concern for religious identity masks a broader indifference to human suffering—both abroad and at home—unless it aligns with his political interests. The controversy highlights a deeper question: Is Nigeria’s complex security crisis being oversimplified into a religious conflict for international consumption? While jihadist groups like ISWAP and Boko Haram have undeniably targeted Christian communities, they have also killed thousands of Muslims, including traditional leaders, clerics, villagers, and security personnel. Analysts have long warned that framing the violence as exclusively anti-Christian risks distorting reality, inflaming sectarian tensions, and obscuring the political, economic, and territorial dimensions of the conflict. Trump’s admission that Muslims are also victims, even if partial, challenges his earlier absolutist framing. Yet his insistence that Christians remain the main targets continues to fuel debate about whether U.S. policy toward Nigeria is being shaped by faith-based narratives rather than nuanced security analysis. As Nigeria battles insurgency, banditry, and transnational terrorism, the exchange between Trump and Sowore underscores how global power politics, religious identity, and media narratives intersect in shaping international responses to African conflicts. The key question remains: is the world seeing Nigeria’s crisis as it truly is—or as it is most politically useful to portray?
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·1K Views
  • Is Superstition Holding Nigerian Communities Hostage? How Fear of ‘Poison,’ Rituals, and Dog Poop Is Fueling Paranoia, Poverty, and Exploitation – By Leo Igwe

    Is superstition silently destroying communities in Nigeria—and why are fear, paranoia, and ritual beliefs still shaping how people interpret illness, death, and misfortune?

    In this powerful and unsettling account, Leo Igwe recounts his return to his hometown in southeastern Nigeria after decades away, where he encountered what he describes as the toxic grip of superstition and irrational fear on everyday life. From the moment he arrived, Igwe says he witnessed how ordinary health issues were being interpreted as the work of unseen enemies using “poison,” spiritual attacks, or occult forces.

    A family housekeeper with a swollen hand claimed he had “picked up poison” while farming—an explanation widely accepted by community members, despite no one being able to describe what the poison was, how it worked, or where it came from. Rather than seeking medical help, the man was subjected to prayers, spiritual pressing, and ritual interventions, which only worsened the condition. For Igwe, this was a troubling reminder of how medical problems are often rebranded as spiritual attacks, delaying proper treatment and deepening fear.

    But why does this mindset persist? Igwe explains that in his community, no one is believed to die naturally. Death, illness, stroke, or paralysis are frequently attributed to enemies—often relatives or neighbors—who are accused of using occult means. Phrases like “they have killed him” or “they have finally gotten him” dominate conversations, reinforcing suspicion and tearing families apart. People live in constant fear that someone has planted spiritual “poisons” that they might step on or touch.

    Despite identifying as Christians, many residents, Igwe notes, move between churches, prophets, pastors, traditional priests, and ritual specialists. They pray to Jesus, invoke ancestors, hire “prayer warriors,” and perform sacrifices in an endless cycle of spiritual protection. But does this offer safety—or does it deepen exploitation? Igwe argues that this climate has created fertile ground for con artists, fake prophets, and self-styled spiritual practitioners who extract money in exchange for deliverance, exorcism, and supposed protection.

    One striking episode involved a roaming prayer man who went from house to house, collecting food or money after loud, theatrical prayers. In another home, Igwe witnessed a dramatic ritual in which sand was placed in people’s hands while God was commanded to “open doors,” even instructing someone to physically open the living room door to symbolize prosperity. To Igwe, this performance illustrated how faith is manipulated into spectacle while poverty remains unchanged.

    Perhaps the most disturbing moment came when a neighbor reported that dog feces found in their compound was not ordinary waste but a weapon of spiritual harm. The family believed it had been ritually placed to bring sickness or death—just as, they claimed, their parents had previously been killed. The response? Olive oil poured on it, urine used as a neutralizer, and the case escalated to village authorities. To Igwe, this episode captured how fear transforms harmless events into imagined threats, driving communities deeper into paranoia.

    Addressing a village meeting, Igwe warned of the dangerous consequences of baseless accusations, superstition, and occult blame, citing how such beliefs have destroyed families and communities across the region. He urged residents to free themselves from irrational fear and confront the social damage caused by suspicion, exploitation, and magical thinking.

    So what is the real cost of these beliefs? According to Igwe, communities trapped in superstition remain locked in poverty, fear, and manipulation, unable to address real health, economic, and social challenges. The essay ultimately asks a haunting question: Can communities break free from the cycle of fear before superstition consumes trust, development, and human dignity?

    Is Superstition Holding Nigerian Communities Hostage? How Fear of ‘Poison,’ Rituals, and Dog Poop Is Fueling Paranoia, Poverty, and Exploitation – By Leo Igwe Is superstition silently destroying communities in Nigeria—and why are fear, paranoia, and ritual beliefs still shaping how people interpret illness, death, and misfortune? In this powerful and unsettling account, Leo Igwe recounts his return to his hometown in southeastern Nigeria after decades away, where he encountered what he describes as the toxic grip of superstition and irrational fear on everyday life. From the moment he arrived, Igwe says he witnessed how ordinary health issues were being interpreted as the work of unseen enemies using “poison,” spiritual attacks, or occult forces. A family housekeeper with a swollen hand claimed he had “picked up poison” while farming—an explanation widely accepted by community members, despite no one being able to describe what the poison was, how it worked, or where it came from. Rather than seeking medical help, the man was subjected to prayers, spiritual pressing, and ritual interventions, which only worsened the condition. For Igwe, this was a troubling reminder of how medical problems are often rebranded as spiritual attacks, delaying proper treatment and deepening fear. But why does this mindset persist? Igwe explains that in his community, no one is believed to die naturally. Death, illness, stroke, or paralysis are frequently attributed to enemies—often relatives or neighbors—who are accused of using occult means. Phrases like “they have killed him” or “they have finally gotten him” dominate conversations, reinforcing suspicion and tearing families apart. People live in constant fear that someone has planted spiritual “poisons” that they might step on or touch. Despite identifying as Christians, many residents, Igwe notes, move between churches, prophets, pastors, traditional priests, and ritual specialists. They pray to Jesus, invoke ancestors, hire “prayer warriors,” and perform sacrifices in an endless cycle of spiritual protection. But does this offer safety—or does it deepen exploitation? Igwe argues that this climate has created fertile ground for con artists, fake prophets, and self-styled spiritual practitioners who extract money in exchange for deliverance, exorcism, and supposed protection. One striking episode involved a roaming prayer man who went from house to house, collecting food or money after loud, theatrical prayers. In another home, Igwe witnessed a dramatic ritual in which sand was placed in people’s hands while God was commanded to “open doors,” even instructing someone to physically open the living room door to symbolize prosperity. To Igwe, this performance illustrated how faith is manipulated into spectacle while poverty remains unchanged. Perhaps the most disturbing moment came when a neighbor reported that dog feces found in their compound was not ordinary waste but a weapon of spiritual harm. The family believed it had been ritually placed to bring sickness or death—just as, they claimed, their parents had previously been killed. The response? Olive oil poured on it, urine used as a neutralizer, and the case escalated to village authorities. To Igwe, this episode captured how fear transforms harmless events into imagined threats, driving communities deeper into paranoia. Addressing a village meeting, Igwe warned of the dangerous consequences of baseless accusations, superstition, and occult blame, citing how such beliefs have destroyed families and communities across the region. He urged residents to free themselves from irrational fear and confront the social damage caused by suspicion, exploitation, and magical thinking. So what is the real cost of these beliefs? According to Igwe, communities trapped in superstition remain locked in poverty, fear, and manipulation, unable to address real health, economic, and social challenges. The essay ultimately asks a haunting question: Can communities break free from the cycle of fear before superstition consumes trust, development, and human dignity?
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·791 Views
  • How Did Anthony Joshua Survive While His Friends Died? Boxer Breaks Silence After Tragic Crash, Mourns Sina Ghami and Latif ‘Latz’ Ayodele

    How does a world-famous champion come to terms with a tragedy that took the lives of those closest to him? And what does faith, grief, and survival mean when you are left behind?

    Former heavyweight boxing champion Anthony Joshua has finally broken his silence after the fatal crash that claimed the lives of his close friends, Sina Ghami and Latif “Latz” Ayodele, describing the moment as one of deep sorrow, reflection, and spiritual resolve. In his first public message since the incident, Joshua turned to X (formerly Twitter) to thank supporters and mourn the men he called his “brothers.”

    Their funeral prayers, held at the London Central Mosque, drew large crowds of mourners from both the Nigerian and British communities, including friends, associates, and supporters who gathered to pay their final respects. The turnout reflected not just the loss of two individuals, but the weight of a tragedy that has shaken Joshua’s inner circle.

    In his message, the boxer revealed how he had never fully understood the importance of those around him until it was too late. “I didn’t even realise how special they are… not even knowing God kept me in the presence of great men,” he wrote. His words captured the pain of hindsight—how ordinary moments of laughter and companionship suddenly became memories of irreplaceable lives.

    But was Joshua the true victim of the crash—or merely the survivor of a loss that families will carry forever? The boxer acknowledged that while the experience had been emotionally devastating for him, the burden on the parents and loved ones of the deceased was far heavier. “100% it’s tough for me, but I know it’s even tougher for their parents,” he said.

    Joshua also turned to faith for comfort, expressing his belief that God understood the hearts of the men who were lost. “I have a strong mind, and I believe God knows their hearts,” he wrote, before ending with a simple but powerful prayer: “May God have mercy on my brothers.”

    As investigations into the circumstances surrounding the crash continue, public attention has remained fixed not only on the tragedy itself but on Joshua’s survival. Why was the boxing star spared when those closest to him were not? And how does one move forward when fame, success, and strength cannot shield against grief?

    For fans around the world, Joshua’s message offers more than mourning—it reveals a deeply personal side of a global sports icon grappling with loss, faith, and the fragile nature of life. In the aftermath of the crash, his words stand as a reminder that even champions are not immune to heartbreak, and that survival can sometimes be the heaviest burden of all.


    How Did Anthony Joshua Survive While His Friends Died? Boxer Breaks Silence After Tragic Crash, Mourns Sina Ghami and Latif ‘Latz’ Ayodele How does a world-famous champion come to terms with a tragedy that took the lives of those closest to him? And what does faith, grief, and survival mean when you are left behind? Former heavyweight boxing champion Anthony Joshua has finally broken his silence after the fatal crash that claimed the lives of his close friends, Sina Ghami and Latif “Latz” Ayodele, describing the moment as one of deep sorrow, reflection, and spiritual resolve. In his first public message since the incident, Joshua turned to X (formerly Twitter) to thank supporters and mourn the men he called his “brothers.” Their funeral prayers, held at the London Central Mosque, drew large crowds of mourners from both the Nigerian and British communities, including friends, associates, and supporters who gathered to pay their final respects. The turnout reflected not just the loss of two individuals, but the weight of a tragedy that has shaken Joshua’s inner circle. In his message, the boxer revealed how he had never fully understood the importance of those around him until it was too late. “I didn’t even realise how special they are… not even knowing God kept me in the presence of great men,” he wrote. His words captured the pain of hindsight—how ordinary moments of laughter and companionship suddenly became memories of irreplaceable lives. But was Joshua the true victim of the crash—or merely the survivor of a loss that families will carry forever? The boxer acknowledged that while the experience had been emotionally devastating for him, the burden on the parents and loved ones of the deceased was far heavier. “100% it’s tough for me, but I know it’s even tougher for their parents,” he said. Joshua also turned to faith for comfort, expressing his belief that God understood the hearts of the men who were lost. “I have a strong mind, and I believe God knows their hearts,” he wrote, before ending with a simple but powerful prayer: “May God have mercy on my brothers.” As investigations into the circumstances surrounding the crash continue, public attention has remained fixed not only on the tragedy itself but on Joshua’s survival. Why was the boxing star spared when those closest to him were not? And how does one move forward when fame, success, and strength cannot shield against grief? For fans around the world, Joshua’s message offers more than mourning—it reveals a deeply personal side of a global sports icon grappling with loss, faith, and the fragile nature of life. In the aftermath of the crash, his words stand as a reminder that even champions are not immune to heartbreak, and that survival can sometimes be the heaviest burden of all.
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·435 Views
  • Why Was a Woman’s Home Burnt for Worshipping Osun in Kwara, Why Were Suspects Freed, and Has Religious Extremism Now Replaced Justice in Ilorin?

    A disturbing case of alleged religious persecution has emerged from Ilorin, Kwara State, where a traditional worshipper, Mrs. T.A. Olorisha, says her home was deliberately set ablaze because of her faith, while suspects arrested over the incident were later released by the police. The traumatised woman has now issued a desperate plea for help, warning that she may take her own life if justice is not served.

    According to Olorisha, she had lived peacefully for years in the Isalẹ Koko area of Ilorin until community members allegedly targeted her over her devotion to Osun, a deity in Yoruba traditional religion. In an emotional video, she recounted how she was summoned to a meeting weeks before the incident, where nine men reportedly told her that an Islamic cleric (“Alfa”) had declared that traditional worshippers were no longer welcome in the community.

    She said she challenged the claim and demanded to meet the cleric face-to-face, insisting she had done nothing wrong. Instead, the men allegedly threatened her, warning that she should either comply or face consequences. Olorisha recalled that one man openly asked what would happen if her house was burnt, while a police officer present advised restraint and later warned the men against causing trouble.

    However, while Olorisha travelled to her hometown to attend a traditional festival, her house was allegedly set on fire on January 1, 2026. The blaze destroyed all her belongings, including livestock, leaving her homeless and destitute. She says she has since been moving around in a single piece of clothing, struggling to survive.

    Her anguish deepened when she learned that suspects initially arrested over the arson had been released, raising fears of intimidation and impunity. In a tearful appeal, she called on Nigerians—especially traditional worshippers—to intervene on her behalf, saying she has nowhere else to turn. She warned that continued abandonment and injustice could push her to suicide.

    SaharaReporters previously reported that three men were arrested in connection with the attack, and the Kwara State Police Command acknowledged awareness of the case. Yet the alleged release of suspects has intensified public concern about whether law enforcement is willing—or able—to confront religious extremism.

    The incident has drawn strong condemnation from Omoyele Sowore, human rights activist and publisher of SaharaReporters, who described the attack as part of a broader pattern of religious intolerance in Ilorin. He warned that extremists must be stopped immediately and reminded authorities that no individual or group has the right to impose religious beliefs on others. Sowore referenced a similar 2023 case involving traditional religion activist Tani Olohun, arguing that repeated failures to enforce the law embolden mobs and radical elements.

    This case has now become a national test of Nigeria’s commitment to religious freedom, constitutional rights, and the rule of law. Why was a woman’s home allegedly destroyed for her beliefs? Why were suspects reportedly freed? And how long will religious intolerance be allowed to override justice in a democratic society?

    For many Nigerians, Olorisha’s plea is not just about one victim—it is about whether the state can still protect citizens from persecution based on faith, or whether silence and inaction will continue to empower extremism.
    Why Was a Woman’s Home Burnt for Worshipping Osun in Kwara, Why Were Suspects Freed, and Has Religious Extremism Now Replaced Justice in Ilorin? A disturbing case of alleged religious persecution has emerged from Ilorin, Kwara State, where a traditional worshipper, Mrs. T.A. Olorisha, says her home was deliberately set ablaze because of her faith, while suspects arrested over the incident were later released by the police. The traumatised woman has now issued a desperate plea for help, warning that she may take her own life if justice is not served. According to Olorisha, she had lived peacefully for years in the Isalẹ Koko area of Ilorin until community members allegedly targeted her over her devotion to Osun, a deity in Yoruba traditional religion. In an emotional video, she recounted how she was summoned to a meeting weeks before the incident, where nine men reportedly told her that an Islamic cleric (“Alfa”) had declared that traditional worshippers were no longer welcome in the community. She said she challenged the claim and demanded to meet the cleric face-to-face, insisting she had done nothing wrong. Instead, the men allegedly threatened her, warning that she should either comply or face consequences. Olorisha recalled that one man openly asked what would happen if her house was burnt, while a police officer present advised restraint and later warned the men against causing trouble. However, while Olorisha travelled to her hometown to attend a traditional festival, her house was allegedly set on fire on January 1, 2026. The blaze destroyed all her belongings, including livestock, leaving her homeless and destitute. She says she has since been moving around in a single piece of clothing, struggling to survive. Her anguish deepened when she learned that suspects initially arrested over the arson had been released, raising fears of intimidation and impunity. In a tearful appeal, she called on Nigerians—especially traditional worshippers—to intervene on her behalf, saying she has nowhere else to turn. She warned that continued abandonment and injustice could push her to suicide. SaharaReporters previously reported that three men were arrested in connection with the attack, and the Kwara State Police Command acknowledged awareness of the case. Yet the alleged release of suspects has intensified public concern about whether law enforcement is willing—or able—to confront religious extremism. The incident has drawn strong condemnation from Omoyele Sowore, human rights activist and publisher of SaharaReporters, who described the attack as part of a broader pattern of religious intolerance in Ilorin. He warned that extremists must be stopped immediately and reminded authorities that no individual or group has the right to impose religious beliefs on others. Sowore referenced a similar 2023 case involving traditional religion activist Tani Olohun, arguing that repeated failures to enforce the law embolden mobs and radical elements. This case has now become a national test of Nigeria’s commitment to religious freedom, constitutional rights, and the rule of law. Why was a woman’s home allegedly destroyed for her beliefs? Why were suspects reportedly freed? And how long will religious intolerance be allowed to override justice in a democratic society? For many Nigerians, Olorisha’s plea is not just about one victim—it is about whether the state can still protect citizens from persecution based on faith, or whether silence and inaction will continue to empower extremism.
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·683 Views
  • A former church member has accused a popular Lagos-based pastor of sexual abuse dating back to when she was 15 — allegations detailed in a new SaharaReporters investigation.

    This story raises uncomfortable but necessary questions:

    Why are alleged abuse cases involving religious leaders so difficult to address?
    Are victims adequately protected when power, faith, and fear intersect?
    Should churches have independent accountability systems?

    Source: SaharaReporters
    A former church member has accused a popular Lagos-based pastor of sexual abuse dating back to when she was 15 — allegations detailed in a new SaharaReporters investigation. This story raises uncomfortable but necessary questions: ❓ Why are alleged abuse cases involving religious leaders so difficult to address? ❓ Are victims adequately protected when power, faith, and fear intersect? ❓ Should churches have independent accountability systems? 📍 Source: SaharaReporters
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·269 Views
  • Pastor Bolaji Idowu Faces Backlash for Sharing Photos of Celebrities at Church Crossover Service

    Pastor Bolaji Idowu of Harvesters International Church in Lagos has drawn criticism for posting photos from his church’s “RESET” crossover service, featuring celebrities like Peller, Broda Shaggi, and SIRBALO Comedy.

    Some social media users accused the pastor of prioritizing celebrities over regular church members, such as ushers and choristers, for social media appeal. Others defended him, saying featuring public figures could inspire more people to attend church and spread faith.

    The pastor has previously sparked online debate by highlighting celebrities, including singer Tiwa Savage and her son, during church events.

    : #PastorBolajiIdowu #CelebrityChurchDebate #ChurchCrossoverService #Peller #BrodaShaggi #SocialMediaCriticism
    Pastor Bolaji Idowu Faces Backlash for Sharing Photos of Celebrities at Church Crossover Service Pastor Bolaji Idowu of Harvesters International Church in Lagos has drawn criticism for posting photos from his church’s “RESET” crossover service, featuring celebrities like Peller, Broda Shaggi, and SIRBALO Comedy. Some social media users accused the pastor of prioritizing celebrities over regular church members, such as ushers and choristers, for social media appeal. Others defended him, saying featuring public figures could inspire more people to attend church and spread faith. The pastor has previously sparked online debate by highlighting celebrities, including singer Tiwa Savage and her son, during church events. : #PastorBolajiIdowu #CelebrityChurchDebate #ChurchCrossoverService #Peller #BrodaShaggi #SocialMediaCriticism
    Dislike
    1
    · 0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·629 Views
  • Nigerian Man Shares Final UK Jehovah’s Witness Worship Experience, Compares It to Nigeria

    A UK-based Nigerian, Bennylee Akanni, shared a video of his last attendance at a Jehovah’s Witness Kingdom Hall in the UK, sparking online debate. He noted he could attend the UK service with braided hair, claiming he would have been denied entry in Nigeria. Social media users reacted with mixed opinions, discussing cultural norms, personal choice, and church practices. The post highlights differences between UK and Nigerian Jehovah’s Witness practices and has drawn attention to broader discussions about membership experiences and personal freedom within the faith.
    Nigerian Man Shares Final UK Jehovah’s Witness Worship Experience, Compares It to Nigeria A UK-based Nigerian, Bennylee Akanni, shared a video of his last attendance at a Jehovah’s Witness Kingdom Hall in the UK, sparking online debate. He noted he could attend the UK service with braided hair, claiming he would have been denied entry in Nigeria. Social media users reacted with mixed opinions, discussing cultural norms, personal choice, and church practices. The post highlights differences between UK and Nigerian Jehovah’s Witness practices and has drawn attention to broader discussions about membership experiences and personal freedom within the faith.
    0 Commenti ·0 condivisioni ·322 Views
Pagine in Evidenza
Fintter https://fintter.com