Sowore in Court Over Alleged False Posts Against Tinubu….


Activist and Sahara Reporters publisher, Omoyele Sowore, has appeared in court to face trial over alleged false online posts against President Bola Tinubu. The Department of State Services (DSS) filed five charges against him, including cybercrimes, defamation and incitement. Authorities claim his publications were intended to mislead the public and provoke unrest, while Sowore maintains that his actions fall within press freedom and political expression.#Fintter news

Nigerian Govt Withdraws Second Criminal Defamation Case Against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan

The Nigerian government has withdrawn the second criminal defamation case against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, ending a high-profile legal battle. Filed by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, the charges stemmed from comments she made accusing former officials of plotting against her. The Federal High Court formally struck out the case, highlighting the need for restraint in prosecutorial powers. Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan hailed the decision as a vindication of democratic rights and freedom of expression.

#NigeriaNews #FreeSpeech #AkpotiUduaghan

Paris Court Convicts 10 People for Cyber-Harassing France’s First Lady Brigitte Macron With False Claims She Is Transgender, Hands Down Suspended Jail Sentences

A Paris court has convicted 10 individuals—eight men and two women—for cyber-harassing France’s First Lady, Brigitte Macron, by spreading false claims that she is a transgender woman. French media reported that the defendants received suspended prison sentences of up to eight months for their roles in circulating the allegations online.

The conspiracy theory falsely claimed that Brigitte Macron was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, which is actually the name of her older brother. The Macrons have faced years of online abuse, also fueled by criticism of their 24-year age difference, but have recently intensified legal action against such attacks.

The ruling comes as President Emmanuel Macron and his wife pursue a separate defamation case in the United States against right-wing podcaster Candace Owens over similar allegations. Speaking to TF1, Brigitte Macron said the harassment had been relentless, including identity tampering on official websites, and stressed that official documents such as birth certificates clearly prove her gender.

She said her legal fight is aimed not only at defending herself but also at setting an example for young people facing online harassment, warning that unchecked cyber abuse can have serious personal and societal consequences.

BREAKING: Nigerian Government Withdraws Criminal Defamation Case Against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Over Allegations Against Akpabio, Yahaya Bello

The Federal Government of Nigeria has formally withdrawn the criminal defamation and cyberbullying case instituted against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central Senatorial District in the 10th National Assembly. Court documents show that the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation filed a notice of discontinuance on December 12, 2025, effectively terminating the prosecution at the Federal High Court.

The charges stemmed from petitions by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, following comments made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview on Politics Today, where she alleged that both men were plotting to eliminate her. Despite earlier petitions to the Inspector General of Police alleging threats to her life, the senator was charged for publicly raising the claims.

Several prominent figures, including Governor Usman Ododo, Senator Ekpenyong Asuquo, Ambassador Reno Omokri, and Sandra Duru, had been listed as witnesses for the complainants. The withdrawn case is one of two criminal matters filed by the Federal Government against the senator, with the second case expected to come up in court and possibly face a similar fate.

The development follows a public announcement by Senate President Akpabio that he had instructed his lawyers to withdraw all defamation-related lawsuits against individuals, after a cleric’s sermon influenced his decision. However, Akpabio still has a separate ₦200 billion civil defamation suit pending against Akpoti-Uduaghan over allegations of sexual harassment, in which he is demanding massive damages and public apologies.

Man Sues Nigerian Police Over Alleged Harassment Linked to Ex-Ondo Governorship Candidate Olusola Oke

An Abeokuta resident, Mr. Adedamola Adetayo, has filed a suit at the Federal High Court, Abeokuta, accusing the Nigeria Police Force of harassment, intimidation, and threats to his life over a defamation dispute involving former Ondo governorship aspirant Chief Olusola Oke, SAN.

Adetayo claims police officers from Life Camp Division, Abuja, repeatedly called him, threatened him, and demanded that he travel to Abuja, despite his health issues and security concerns along the route. He argues that the dispute is civil in nature and should be handled locally.

He is seeking declarations that the alleged threats violate his fundamental rights, an order restraining further harassment, and that any investigation be conducted in Abeokuta. A letter to Oke warns against criminalizing a civil matter, highlighting potential misuse of state power and urging restraint.

The Federal High Court will hear the matter, which raises questions about the limits of police powers in civil disputes and the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights.

Senate President Akpabio Withdraws All Defamation Lawsuits Against Natasha Akpoti, Others After Priest’s Sermon Sparks Change of Heart

Senate President Godswill Akpabio has ordered his lawyers to withdraw all pending defamation lawsuits he filed against individuals who accused him of misconduct, including Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. Akpabio made the announcement during a church programme, revealing that a sermon delivered by a priest prompted him to reassess his actions and abandon the legal battles.

He disclosed that he had instituted nearly nine court cases against people he accused of lying, slandering his name and defaming his character, but decided to discontinue all of them after reflecting on the message preached in church. Although he did not provide full details of each case, the decision directly affects the high-profile ₦200 billion defamation suit he filed against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan in December 2025.

In that lawsuit, Akpabio accused the Kogi Central lawmaker of making false allegations of sexual harassment, which he claimed damaged his reputation, subjected him to public ridicule and portrayed him as a predator abusing his office. Court documents showed that he sought sweeping remedies, including massive damages, retractions, and nationwide broadcast apologies, as well as the removal of online content linked to the allegations.

The case had already progressed with court approval for substituted service through the Clerk of the National Assembly after attempts to serve Akpoti-Uduaghan directly failed. Akpabio also argued that the allegations, widely circulated across television, radio and social media, caused him severe humiliation and distress.

His sudden decision to discontinue all defamation suits marks a dramatic turnaround in a legal confrontation that had attracted intense public attention, raising fresh political and legal questions about accountability, reconciliation and the use of defamation laws by powerful public officials in Nigeria.

Doris Ogala Gives Pastor Chris Okafor 24-Hour Ultimatum Over VDM Lawsuit

Nollywood actress Doris Ogala has intervened in the ongoing controversy involving Pastor Chris Okafor and social media activist Martins Vincent Otse (VeryDarkMan). Ogala issued a stern ultimatum, demanding that Pastor Okafor withdraw his defamation lawsuit against VeryDarkMan within 24 hours and issue a public apology. The lawsuit followed allegations by a woman claiming to be Okafor’s daughter. Ogala framed the legal action as a “misstep,” suggesting further complications could arise for the pastor. Pastor Okafor has denied the allegations, stating DNA evidence disproves the claim. Social media users have reacted strongly to Ogala’s intervention, which has intensified public scrutiny of the case.

Sheikh Gumi Sues Two Facebook Users Over Alleged Defamation, Says False Threat Claims Endangered His Life

Renowned Islamic scholar, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, has instituted a criminal defamation case against two Facebook users, George Udom and Bello Isiaka, at the Chief Magistrate Court in Kaduna State over publications he says were falsely attributed to him and seriously damaged his reputation. The suit, filed on December 24, 2025, followed a Facebook post alleging that Gumi threatened Nigeria’s Minister of Defence, Christopher Musa, over ongoing military operations against bandits.

According to court documents, the defendants allegedly published a statement claiming that Gumi warned that the minister’s family in Zango Kataf, Southern Kaduna, would be eliminated if military offensives against bandits continued. Through his lawyer, Suleiman Lere, Sheikh Gumi categorically denied ever making or endorsing such remarks, describing the publication as malicious, reckless and deliberately crafted to portray him as a terrorist sympathiser and a threat to national security.

Gumi maintained that the false claim gravely harmed his standing as a cleric known for advocating peace, dialogue and restraint, while also exposing him to possible reprisals from security agencies and members of the public. His legal team warned that the era of hiding behind social media platforms to spread falsehoods and destroy reputations was coming to an end.

The criminal summons cited provisions of the Kaduna State Penal Code Law, 2017, under which the alleged offences attract serious penalties upon conviction. The case has further drawn attention to the growing problem of misinformation and defamation on social media in Nigeria, particularly against high-profile figures.

Sheikh Gumi, who has previously engaged armed bandits as part of peace-building efforts in northern Nigeria, reiterated that he stepped back from such engagements after the federal government designated bandits as terrorists in 2021. He stressed that while his past interventions were aimed at peace and economic stability, they exposed him to significant personal risks he is no longer willing to take.

Renowned Islamic cleric Sheikh Dr. Ahmad Abubakar Gumi has approached the Chief Magistrate Court of Kaduna State, seeking criminal action against two Facebook users over an alleged defamatory publication and death threat linked to Nigeria’s Minister of Defence. The legal action follows claims that the defendants falsely attributed a threatening statement to Sheikh Gumi, portraying him as the author of a violent warning directed at the defence minister and his family.

Court documents obtained by SaharaReporters show that the application was filed at the Chief Magistrate Court sitting on Ibrahim Taiwo Road, Kaduna. The matter, listed as Case No: KD Km 1685725, names Sheikh Gumi as the complainant, while George Udom and Bello Isiaka are listed as defendants. Sheikh Gumi is seeking the issuance of a criminal direct complaint summons against the two individuals.

According to the application addressed to the Registrar of the court, the complaint arose from a Facebook post allegedly published by the defendants on December 23, 2025. The post, described as a “Breaking News” item, reportedly stated that if the Minister of Defence, Christopher Musa, did not stop military operations against bandits, his entire family in Zangon Kataf, Southern Kaduna, would be eliminated.

The filing further identified the Facebook accounts allegedly used to publish the statement, including the usernames and partial phone details associated with George Udom and Bello Isiaka. Sheikh Gumi told the court that his photograph was attached to the post, leading many social media users to believe that he authored the statement. He said he received numerous calls from people who assumed he had issued the threat against the defence minister.

Sheikh Gumi argued that the publication falsely portrayed him as someone who threatened a public servant, specifically the Minister of Defence, whose constitutional responsibility includes maintaining peace and security across Nigeria, including Kaduna State. He maintained that the post not only damaged his reputation but also posed serious security implications by linking him to a potential act of violence.

Describing himself as an Islamic scholar widely known for preaching peace in Nigeria and beyond, Sheikh Gumi stated that the publication painted him as a troublemaker capable of inciting unrest and disrupting the fragile peace in Kaduna State. He further warned that the post positioned him as a prime suspect should any attack occur against the defence minister’s family or in Southern Kaduna, thereby exposing him to possible danger and state scrutiny.

According to the court filing, the alleged actions of the defendants violate several provisions of the Kaduna State Penal Code Law 2017, including sections relating to criminal conspiracy, attempted public disturbance, and criminal defamation. Sheikh Gumi’s legal team argued that the publication was not only defamatory but also capable of inciting fear, unrest, and public disorder.

The application, dated December 24, 2025, was signed by Sheikh Gumi’s lawyers from the firm of Suleiman D. Lere & Co., Kaduna. The legal team includes Suleiman Danlami Lere Esq., Ibrahim Ahmad Esq., I.H. Yahya Esq., and Saratu Nura Hassan Esq.

As of the time of reporting, the Chief Magistrate Court has not fixed a date for the hearing of the application or for the issuance of the criminal summons. The case adds to ongoing debates around misinformation, misuse of social media, and the legal consequences of publishing unverified and potentially dangerous content in Nigeria.

The development also comes amid heightened national sensitivity over security operations, online hate speech, and the spread of false information capable of inflaming tensions or undermining public confidence in security institutions.

Sowore Kept Screaming About Malami’s Corruption Since 2021’ — Deji Adeyanju Says EFCC Charges Validate Long-Standing Allegations Against Ex-AGF

Human rights activist and lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, has reacted strongly to the ongoing prosecution of former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), saying the charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) confirm long-standing corruption allegations raised years earlier by activist and former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore.
Speaking on Wednesday, Adeyanju said Sowore had consistently warned Nigerians since 2021 about what he described as Malami’s “brazen corruption” while he was still in office, but those warnings were largely ignored at the time. According to Adeyanju, the emergence of what he termed “receipts” from the EFCC now validates those earlier accusations and underscores the importance of sustained civic activism and accountability.
Adeyanju accused Malami of abusing public trust by allegedly amassing enormous wealth and acquiring multiple high-value properties across Nigeria during his tenure as the country’s chief law officer. He described the alleged actions as not merely isolated incidents but part of a deliberate and systematic effort to build a vast illicit empire, stressing that no public official should be allowed to operate above the law.
The activist called on anti-graft agencies to pursue the case thoroughly and without political interference, insisting that Nigeria cannot progress if powerful officials are allowed to allegedly loot public resources with impunity. He said the Malami case should serve as a strong warning to current and future office holders.
Malami is currently facing 16 criminal counts bordering on money laundering, conspiracy, and unlawful acquisition of assets. Prosecutors allege that he, alongside his son, Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami, and an associate, Hajia Bashir Asabe, used corporate fronts and proxies to conceal and launder funds totaling several billion naira between 2015 and 2025. The EFCC claims that at least 30 high-value properties worth an estimated ₦212.8 billion were acquired through proceeds of unlawful activities.
Court documents further allege that the defendants used companies such as Metropolitan Auto Tech Limited, Rahamaniyya Properties Limited, and Meethaq Hotels Limited to disguise the source of funds deposited in various bank accounts and used to purchase luxury properties in Abuja, Kano, and Birnin Kebbi. The alleged offences are said to violate Nigeria’s Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act and related laws.
The case has reignited public debate about corruption, free speech, and the risks faced by whistleblowers and investigative journalists, especially in light of previous defamation suits filed against Sowore and SaharaReporters over reports exposing Malami’s alleged lifestyle and asset accumulation.

“Nigerians Are Hypocrites” — Tacha doubles down, slams selective outrage over cyberbullying and arrests following content creator Lawrence Alabi'

Reality TV star and media personality Tacha has reacted again following the online drama surrounding cyberbullying, arrests, and public humiliation, and she is not holding back.

In a lengthy post on X, Tacha made it clear that she does not support bullying, cyberbullying, cyberstalking, or defamation in any form. She stressed that she has nothing against Lawrence Alabi or his wife, describing Alabi’s wife as “an amazing woman” who does not deserve daily trolling.

However, Tacha turned the spotlight on what she described as Nigeria’s biggest problem online: hypocrisy.

According to her, many Nigerians only call out oppression or corruption when it doesn’t benefit them or when the victim isn’t someone they like.

She pointed out that she has personally taken people to court in the past without turning police stations into content factories or humiliating anyone online.

“I did not make one video. I did not take one picture. Because I am not the law,” she said, explaining that she followed due process quietly.

Tacha also questioned why Nigerians suddenly act shocked when popular figures use legal means, even though many influencers built their platforms off trolling, dragging, and pushing harmful agendas.

She cited the backlash actress Toyin Abraham faced after arresting someone who allegedly trolled her family, noting how Nigerians quickly framed it as “oppression” simply because they don’t like her.

Her final stance was clear and firm:
Use the law if you must — but don’t add public humiliation to it.

“You cannot do this in the UK, even with a billion pounds,” she said, urging Nigerians to be guided and consistent with their outrage.

Once again, Tacha has reignited a bigger conversation about accountability, bullying culture, and selective morality on Nigerian social media.

Trump Sues BBC For $10bn Over Documentary Edit

Former US President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit demanding at least $10 billion in damages from the BBC, accusing the British broadcaster of defamation over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech to supporters ahead of the US Capitol riot.

Trump argues that the edited footage misrepresented his remarks and unfairly linked him to the violence that followed. The BBC has rejected the defamation claims, insisting its reporting met editorial standards. However, BBC Chairman Samir Shah has reportedly written to Trump to apologise over concerns raised about the documentary.

The legal battle adds to Trump’s long-running disputes with major media organisations, as he continues to challenge coverage of his role in the January 6 events.

#Trump #BBC #MediaLawsuit #USPolitics

President Donald Trump Sues BBC for $10 Billion Over Alleged “Serial Fake News” and Defamation in Edited January 6 Speech Documentary

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC, accusing the British broadcaster of defamation and a pattern of “serial fake news” reporting. The lawsuit stems from a Panorama documentary that allegedly edited Trump’s January 6, 2021 speech, misleadingly portraying him as inciting violence. Despite a BBC apology and the resignation of its two top officials, Trump claims the broadcaster showed no genuine remorse or institutional changes. Legal experts note that Trump must prove actual malice under U.S. law, while the BBC maintains the edits did not create a false impression. The case has reignited global debate over media accountability, editorial integrity, and press freedom.

BREAKING: The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Gwarinpa, Abuja, has directed that a ₦40 billion defamation lawsuit be served on the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, through substituted means.

Ex-Kano Anti-Corruption Chairman Muhuyi Magaji Narrates Police Ordeal After Arrest in Abuja

Former Chairman of the Kano Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission (PCACC), Muhuyi Magaji, has recounted his ordeal after being arrested by heavily armed police officers and transported overnight to Abuja. Magaji said his detention was linked to his role as lead prosecution counsel in the multibillion-naira Dala Inland Dry Port case. He revealed that he spent over 24 hours in custody, was denied access to the arrest warrant, and was later charged with defamation. Rights group HEDA condemned the arrest as politically motivated and part of a pattern of intimidation against Magaji following his anti-corruption investigations.

JUST IN: Natasha Akpoti Fires Back — Says Akpabio’s ₦200BN Lawsuit Will Finally Exp0se His Alleged S£xual Harassment

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has dropped a bombshell after receiving a ₦200 billion defamation lawsuit from Senate President Godswill Akpabio over allegations of s£xual harassment.

In her statement, Natasha said she is relieved the case has finally landed in court — because, according to her, the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges refused to hear her earlier complaints, hiding behind the excuse that Akpabio’s wife had already sued her.

She wrote:

“I now have a chance to prove how I was s£xually harassed, and how my refusal to give into his demands unleashed a series of unprovoked attacks on my person. See you in court, Godswill Akpabio.”

With both heavyweights now heading to court, Nigerians are bracing for what could become one of the biggest political scandals of 2025.

Do you think this court battle will finally reveal the truth — or will it be another political drama swept under the carpet?

If It’s Loud, It’s NewsFlash!

SHARE this post to keep others informed.

FOLLOW our page for more breaking updates as they unfold.

#newsflashnigeria #natashavsakpabio #PoliticsUnmasked

Akpabio Files ₦200bn Defamation Suit Against Senator Natasha Over Sexual Harassment Allegations

Senate President Godswill Akpabio has filed a ₦200 billion defamation lawsuit against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, accusing her of spreading damaging allegations that he sexually harassed her. Filed at the FCT High Court, the suit claims Natasha’s interviews on TV, radio, and online platforms portrayed Akpabio as a predator, causing reputational harm and public ridicule.

Akpabio is demanding retractions, removal of all online content containing the allegations, and apologies broadcast nationwide. The court has also granted his request to serve Senator Natasha through the Clerk of the National Assembly after attempts at personal service failed. The case is set to become one of Nigeria’s most closely watched political legal battles.

Senator Natasha Challenges Akpabio, Says She’s Ready to Prove Sexual Harassment Claims in Court

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has responded to Senate President Godswill Akpabio’s ₦200 billion defamation suit, declaring she is fully prepared for a legal showdown. She says the case finally gives her the opportunity the Senate Ethics Committee allegedly denied her to present evidence of sexual harassment and subsequent attacks she claims followed her refusal to his advances. The suit, filed at the FCT High Court, has been adjourned to January 21, 2026.

Court Sets December 9 for Hearing in Tonye Cole’s ₦40B Defamation Suit Against FCT Minister Wike

The FCT High Court has scheduled December 9, 2025, for the mention of Tonye Patrick Cole’s ₦40 billion defamation lawsuit against FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and Channels Television. Cole, the 2023 APC governorship candidate in Rivers State, accuses Wike of making false and damaging statements during a September 18 broadcast, alleging financial misconduct involving state resources, Rivers State gas, and the Olympia Hotel. Represented by senior lawyer J.S. Okutepa, Cole seeks ₦40 billion in damages, ₦500 million in legal costs, a public apology, retraction of the statements, and a perpetual injunction restraining further defamatory publications. The defendants have been ordered to enter appearance within 21 days of receiving the writ.

Viral TikToker Retracts Claim That Ned Nwoko Sponsored Assassination Attempt on Regina Daniels

A TikTok user known as Liar of TikTok, who recently accused Senator Ned Nwoko of paying him to assassinate actress Regina Daniels, has made a sudden U-turn, admitting the entire claim was fabricated for attention. His viral video had stirred widespread controversy, especially amid rumours of tension between Regina and her husband.
Following the allegations, Nwoko issued a strong statement denying the claims and threatened legal action against anyone spreading falsehoods. In a new video, the TikToker insisted he never mentioned Nwoko directly and described himself as someone who deliberately creates fictional stories online. His retraction has sparked mixed reactions from Nigerians, many of whom believe he should face legal consequences for defamation.