“Peter Obi Is Not My Leader” — Orji Kalu Declares, Says He Remains the Most Influential Politician in the Southeast

Senator Orji Uzor Kalu, former Governor of Abia State, has stirred political tension with his bold declaration that Peter Obi is not his leader, asserting that his extensive political achievements make him the most prominent politician from the Southeast.

Speaking during an interview on Channels Television, Kalu emphasized his long-standing influence in Nigerian politics, dismissing suggestions that Obi holds any political authority over him.

In his words:

“He is not my leader. I’m the most important politician from that zone. I have won two states before. I ran for President before — my 4.9 million votes are still there in 2007. I achieved a lot with PPA. We had ministers, we had ambassadors with President Yar’Adua.”

The senator highlighted his decades of political success — from his gubernatorial leadership to his presidential bid under the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) — noting that his legacy extends beyond regional politics.

Kalu’s remarks come amid the growing influence of Peter Obi, whose performance in the 2023 presidential election as the Labour Party’s candidate positioned him as a major political figure, especially in the Southeast where he enjoys massive grassroots support.

David Mark Pledges a “Bigger, Stronger, and Purpose-Driven” ADC Ahead of 2027 Elections


The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has announced its vision to build a political party that transcends individual personalities, surpasses any movement, and stands out in the history of Nigerian politics.

Speaking at the inaugural meeting of the ADC National Working Committee (NWC) in Abuja on Tuesday, Senator David Mark, the party’s national chairman, said the journey ahead would be challenging and demand significant sacrifices.

“Our mission is not just to attain power in 2027 but to leave a legacy that future generations will be proud to inherit,” Mark said.


The high-profile meeting drew respected leaders from across Nigeria, including former Osun State Governor and ADC National Secretary Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, National Publicity Secretary Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, former SGF Babachir Lawal, Chief Oserheimen Osunbor, and actor Kenneth Okonkwo, among others.

In his remarks, Mark emphasized that ADC members have set aside narrow interests in favor of the common good, stating,

“We advance calmly, courageously, together as a formidable team.”


He added that the ADC would be a party of purpose and determination, committed to promoting democratic values, accountability, and responsibility in every government it forms.

Drawing from his experience as a former Senate President, Mark expressed concern over attempts—both subtle and overt—to undermine the legislature and judiciary. He promised that the ADC would defend the separation of powers, restore legislative and judicial independence, and ensure that public budgets serve the people, not private interests.

The party’s declaration signals a new chapter in Nigeria’s political landscape as it positions itself for the 2027 elections with a focus on principle-driven governance and lasting impact.

Analyst Criticizes Atiku’s Use of Marriages as Political Appeal to Yoruba Voters

A public affairs analyst, Dele Fanimo, has criticized attempts by politicians to use their marriages as evidence of national inclusivity, specifically referencing former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s outreach to Yoruba voters.

Speaking on Voice of the People TV, Fanimo questioned the sincerity of such tactics, arguing that marrying across ethnic lines does not necessarily prove genuine commitment to national unity.

“Who is asking him in the first instance to tell us how much he loves Yoruba?” Fanimo asked rhetorically.


He pointed out that Atiku has wives from multiple regions, including the Yoruba, Igbo, and South-South, but maintained that this does not automatically make him a “pan-Nigerian.”

“Titi Atiku is his wife, the same way he also married somebody from Igboland, the same way he also married from the South-South—and that doesn’t make him a pan-Nigerian,” Fanimo said.


The analyst added that Nigerian voters are becoming more discerning about political rhetoric:

“Nigerians are becoming conscious of the lies politicians put up,” he observed.


Extending his criticism beyond Atiku, Fanimo said the issue reflects a broader trend in Nigerian politics.

“It’s not only Atiku. Most politicians, when they need your vote, there is nothing they will not tell you,” he remarked.


His comments echo a growing skepticism among political observers about the sincerity of politicians’ appeals to different ethnic and regional groups during campaigns

Obasanjo Recounts Emotional Moment He Learned of Abacha’s Death

Former Nigerian President, Olusegun Obasanjo, has relived the dramatic moment he was informed of the death of General Sani Abacha, the late military ruler whose regime imprisoned him.

Speaking in a video shared by Symfoni TV, Obasanjo reflected on one of Nigeria’s most turbulent political eras, offering rare personal insight into how the end of Abacha’s rule became both a personal and national turning point.

Obasanjo was jailed in 1995 after being accused of plotting a coup against Abacha’s government—charges he consistently denied. Despite the uncertainty of his imprisonment, he said he held on to the hope of eventual freedom, though he never knew when it would come.

According to him, the shocking news of Abacha’s death on June 8, 1998, first came from a prison warder.

“The day Abacha died, a warder came to me and said, ‘Sir, congratulations.’
I asked him, ‘Warder, what is the problem?’
He replied, ‘Our enemy has died.’
I asked again, ‘Who is your enemy?’ And he said, ‘Abacha.’”

Initially, Obasanjo thought it might be a trap or misinformation. But as more warders repeated the same news, he realized something significant had happened.

Within a week, Obasanjo was released from Yola Prison, marking the start of his remarkable political comeback.

Abacha’s sudden death ended a regime often associated with human rights abuses, political repression, and corruption. His successor, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, quickly initiated a transition program that restored democracy in 1999.

For Obasanjo, the moment was more than personal liberation—it was a national rebirth. Less than a year later, he won the presidential election under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and became Nigeria’s first civilian president of the Fourth Republic.

Reflecting on his imprisonment, Obasanjo has often said the experience deepened his commitment to democracy and shaped many of his decisions while in office.

Since leaving office in 2007, he has remained an influential voice in Nigerian politics, frequently speaking on governance, security, and development. His recollections of the Abacha years, analysts say, highlight how moments of personal suffering can intersect with broader national transformation.

Obasanjo’s story remains a testament to resilience, timing, and the unpredictable turns of history that have defined Nigeria’s journey from military rule to democracy.

BASA Accuses Governor Makinde of Betrayal, Says He Abandoned Her Local Government for Another Candidate

Bolanle Aminat Sarumi-Aliyu (BASA), a former Senior Special Assistant on Diaspora Matters to Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde, has voiced strong disappointment over what she described as a breach of political trust by the governor.

In a video interview shared on the official YouTube channel of Edmund Obilo, BASA recounted how Governor Makinde had personally pledged support for her ambition to contest a seat in the House of Representatives under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). According to her, the governor encouraged her candidacy as part of his stated commitment to increase women’s participation in politics.

However, BASA said things took a different turn when the decisive moment arrived. She claimed the governor abandoned his promise, leaving her and her supporters embarrassed, while instead throwing his weight behind another consensus candidate.

“He disappointed and abandoned my local government in front of all of us the same day he chose the other consensus candidate,” she said.

Her remarks have sparked debate among political observers, with many pointing to her experience as another example of how women often face exclusion despite ongoing calls for gender inclusivity in Nigerian politics.

BASA’s outburst is expected to reignite discussions about trust, loyalty, and fairness within the PDP in Oyo State, while also highlighting broader concerns about women’s representation in leadership positions.

Ifeanyi C. Ejiofor, Esq. (KSC), a distinguished lawyer and prominent human rights advocate, recently spoke with The Sun about various governance challenges facing Nigeria, focusing on the impact on the Igbo people and the security situation in his home state, Anambra.


During the interview, Ejiofor addressed the topic of the 2027 general elections, specifically responding to remarks made by Dr. Reuben Abati. Abati had suggested on national television that the Northern region of Nigeria would likely oppose Peter Obi’s proposal for a one-term presidency due to deep-seated mistrust rooted in the Civil War era.

Ejiofor concurred with this perspective, stating that Abati’s comment accurately reflects the enduring political realities shaped by the unresolved consequences of Nigeria’s civil conflict.

Although the war formally ended in 1970, Ejiofor explained, its aftereffects continue to influence Nigeria’s political, economic, and social structures decades later. He pointed out that the legacy of exclusion remains deeply embedded, particularly affecting the Igbo ethnic group.


Ejiofor highlighted how the current political framework appears to be structurally biased against the South-East, with key national leadership roles often inaccessible to people from that region. This ongoing marginalization fosters a sense of alienation among the Igbo population.

Experts have long noted that Nigeria’s presidency has traditionally rotated between the North and South-West regions, effectively sidelining the South-East and diminishing the prospects for an Igbo presidency. Reflecting on this reality, Ejiofor remarked that it would be easier for “an elephant to pass through the eye of a needle than for an Igbo to become president under the present political structure.”

He emphasized that this difficult truth may be uncomfortable for some but remains the stark reality of Nigerian politics.

Ejiofor’s comments bring to light the enduring ethnic and regional divisions within Nigeria’s political landscape, underscoring the urgent need for more inclusive governance and reconciliation to heal long-standing wounds.

Deji Adeyanju Slams ‘Obidient’ Movement Over Online Harassment of Prominent Nigerians

Human rights activist and lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, has once again criticized the online conduct of supporters of Labour Party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, popularly called the “Obidient” movement.

Speaking in an interview reported by The Cable on Saturday, August 30, 2025, Adeyanju alleged that Obi’s supporters have consistently harassed prominent Nigerians who chose not to support the former Anambra governor.

He cited respected personalities in arts, culture, and politics — including veteran actress Joke Silva and Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka — as victims of coordinated online attacks.

According to him, dissent and neutrality are no longer tolerated by these online “mobs,” who insult, demonize, and even label critics as part of what they call the “Obidient Gulag” — a reference to the infamous Soviet labor camps of the mid-20th century.

Adeyanju also referenced the backlash against actress Mercy Johnson, who faced severe criticism after endorsing President Bola Tinubu at an APC rally. He argued that such cyberbullying discourages freedom of expression and undermines Nigeria’s democratic values.

“Reducing politics to intimidation and mob action on social media risks creating deeper societal divisions,” he warned.

While Adeyanju’s remarks have fueled renewed debate about civility in political discourse, some observers insist that the passion of Obi’s supporters stems from long-standing frustration with Nigeria’s political elite.

Nonetheless, his comments have reopened conversations about tolerance, democracy, and the growing influence of social media in Nigerian politics.

Jonathan Meets IBB & Abdulsalami in Abuja Amid Ongoing National Consultations

Former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan on Sunday paid a courtesy visit to former Nigerian heads of state, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) and General Abdulsalami Abubakar, at their Abuja residence.

The closed-door meeting reportedly lasted several hours, though details have not been made public. Jonathan, known for his consistent calls for dialogue and consultation in tackling Nigeria’s challenges, is believed to have used the visit as part of his wider engagement with elder statesmen across the country.

Generals Abdulsalami and Babangida remain towering figures in Nigerian politics. Abdulsalami is revered for ushering in the Fourth Republic in 1999, while Babangida remains a key voice in national discourse, having ruled between 1985 and 1993.

Jonathan, who governed from 2010 to 2015, has maintained regular contact with past leaders, fostering discussions on unity, governance, and peace. His Abuja visit once again highlights the tradition of former leaders consulting one another to strengthen national stability.

#GoodluckJonathan #IBB #Abdulsalami #NigeriaPolitics #Leadership #Unity #NationBuilding

2027 Elections: Ayodele Warns of Rising “Giant” That Could Reshape Nigeria’s Political Future

Prophet Ayodele has set Nigeria’s political space buzzing with a striking prophecy about the emergence of a formidable new candidate who could change the course of the 2027 general elections.

He stressed the growing importance of public opinion in determining political outcomes, warning that the country’s political elite must prepare early to avoid being blindsided by this rising force.

Ayodele urged leaders to recognize the shifting tides of Nigerian politics and adapt quickly to maintain relevance and influence in the nation’s fast-changing political landscape.

His message has already triggered intense debate both online and among political analysts, with many speculating about the identity of this “giant” and the alliances that could form ahead of the polls. As the 2027 elections draw closer, attention will increasingly focus on emerging figures and unexpected political shifts.

#NigeriaPolitics #2027Elections #PoliticalProphecy #AyodeleSpeaks #PowerShift #EmergingLeaders #PoliticalGiant

ADC knocks PDP over moves to woo Obi, claims party has lost influence.

Arewa Forum backs Jonathan’s return, dismisses Obi’s one-term pledge
• PDP chieftain welcomes Jonathan, Atiku, Obi, seeks open presidential primary

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has taken a swipe at the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) over reported efforts to woo Peter Obi, describing the development as a clear sign of the party’s political decline.

National Publicity Secretary of the ADC, Bolaji Abdullahi, said it was “laughable” that the PDP, once dominant in Nigerian politics, was now “begging for candidates all over the place,” a situation he claimed reflected the former ruling party’s loss of relevance.

“If the PDP is truly wooing Peter Obi, that tells you how low the party has degenerated,” Abdullahi said.

“This is the same party that many Nigerians were once desperate to get its ticket. Now they are begging for candidates. Why would we be threatened by that?”

Obi, who was the Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 election, is also a key member of the ADC-led opposition coalition. His name has resurfaced in political circles following remarks by prominent PDP figures urging him to return to the party.

Among those making the overtures are former Information Minister, Prof Jerry Gana, and Chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum, Governor Bala Mohammed of Bauchi State, who recently described Obi as the de facto leader of the opposition.

But Abdullahi dismissed the outreach, stating that Obi remains a part of the coalition and is fully aware of what he called the PDP’s “destructive internal dynamics.”

Gov Soludo shades ‘these other guys’ claiming they only want to do one term.

Anambra State Governor, Chukwuma Soludo, has stirred reactions with a blunt remark targeting politicians who promise to serve only one term in office, suggesting such claims are unrealistic and illogical.

Speaking during a high-energy rally in Anambra South to drum up support for his second-term bid, Soludo questioned the sincerity and mental soundness of any politician pledging to serve a single term, arguing that it contradicts both logic and constitutional provisions.

“You come to people and say I will do only one term. Anybody, any politician that says that should be sent to a psych+attic home. Because the person must have some mental problem.

When the constitution allows you to stay for eight years, they come and tell us I’m going to spend one term. Tell us where it has ever happened,” Soludo said.

He challenged proponents of the single-term idea to cite any instance in Nigerian politics where such a promise was fulfilled, emphasizing that the country’s constitution clearly allows for two terms.

As he pushes for re-election, Soludo’s statement underlines his intent to fully utilize the constitutional window to continue his development agenda for Anambra State, while throwing shade at political opponents he perceives as unserious or disingenuous.

“They say Tinubu is playing chess not checkers.
But who’s really pulling the strings in Nigerian politics?
Share your theory ”

T-Pain and Other Nicknames Nigerians Call President Tinubu – And What They Mean

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Nigeria's 16th president, has acquired several nicknames over the years, each reflecting public perception, political influence, and his evolving leadership style. These names arise from admiration, satire, or criticism, and they highlight the complex relationship between Tinubu and the Nigerian people.

Recently, a new nickname — T-Pain — has gained traction. This latest moniker underscores the economic struggles many Nigerians are currently experiencing.

1. T-Pain

The most recent nickname, T-Pain, is a play on the name of the American singer and combines the letter “T” (for Tinubu) with “Pain.” It reflects the frustration of many Nigerians who are grappling with economic hardship, especially following the removal of fuel subsidies. The rising cost of living, inflation, and unemployment have deepened public discontent.

While the name began as a critique, some of Tinubu's supporters have attempted to rebrand it positively — interpreting it as "Temporary Pain" — in line with his “Renewed Hope” manifesto, suggesting that current difficulties are necessary steps toward a better future.

2. Jagaban

One of Tinubu’s most enduring titles, Jagaban, translates loosely to “leader of warriors.” Originating from the Hausa words ja (to pull) and gaba (front), it implies someone who leads from the front. “Jagaban Borgu” specifically refers to the Chief Warrior of the Borgu Kingdom, a title Tinubu holds. It signifies his dominance in Nigerian politics, especially in Lagos, where he is considered a political kingmaker.

3. Asiwaju

A Yoruba term meaning “leader” or “forerunner,” Asiwaju emphasizes Tinubu’s trailblazing role in Nigerian politics. His strategic political moves and ability to shape the political landscape have cemented this title among supporters and critics alike.

4. City Boy

The nickname City Boy reflects Tinubu’s deep ties to Lagos, Nigeria’s commercial hub. It highlights both his influence in urban politics and his central role in transforming Lagos during his tenure as governor. The name evokes admiration from some and criticism from others, depending on one's view of his legacy in the city.

5. Emilokan

Emilokan, a Yoruba phrase meaning “It’s my turn,” became Tinubu’s rallying cry during the 2023 presidential campaign. It captured his ambition and belief that, after years of political groundwork, he had earned the right to lead Nigeria. The phrase resonated widely and became symbolic of his determination and political resilience.

Political Reactions

Political analyst Dr. 'Toks Oguntuga has noted that the T-Pain nickname, though humorous on the surface, is a serious emotional outlet for citizens grappling with economic pressure. He argues that such names reflect public sentiment and should not be dismissed as mere social media banter.

As President Tinubu navigates his term, these nicknames — both flattering and critical — will continue to serve as barometers of his public perception.

Understanding the Difference Between Constituency Allocation and Allowance in Nigerian Politics

By Adebonojo Moyosore

In the ongoing discourse about governance, public trust, and legislative accountability, two often misunderstood concepts are constituency allocation and constituency allowance.Though they sound similar, their functions, implications, and sources of controversy are quite distinct. For a fair and informed opinion on political performance especially at the state or federal legislative level these terms must be properly unpacked.

1. Constituency Allocation: Developmental in Nature

Definition: Constituency allocation (often called constituency project fund) refers to public funds set aside in the national or state budget specifically for development projects within a lawmaker’s constituency. These could include boreholes, classroom blocks, health centres, road grading, and other public services.

Purpose: It is intended to bridge the gap between the federal/state government and rural or underrepresented communities. Lawmakers usually nominate or facilitate these projects through relevant MDAs (ministries, departments, and agencies), but do not directly manage or disburse the funds themselves.

Implications: These projects are not personal donations by the lawmakers.

Their execution is funded by taxpayer money, not private generosity.

Success or failure often depends on implementation by government agencies or contractors.


Controversy: Many constituents, unaware of this distinction, wrongly attribute the projects either directly to the lawmaker or blame them entirely for failed or poorly executed projects. It fuels false narratives of “generosity” or “non-performance”.


2. Constituency Allowance: Personal but Official

Definition: Constituency allowance, on the other hand, is part of a legislator’s official remuneration package monthly or annual financial provisions to support their operational cost of staying in touch with and servicing their constituents.

Purpose: This allowance covers logistics such as constituency office maintenance, staffing, community outreach, consultations, travel, and sometimes personal interventions (e.g., donations at burials, festivals, or emergencies).

Implications: It is personal spending with public funds, requiring judicious use.

Unlike allocations, this is not tied to infrastructure development but rather to representation and accessibility.

Misuse of allowance (e.g., pocketing the funds without maintaining constituency presence) is a frequent concern.


Controversy: Because it is not publicly tracked like project funds, the allowance often breeds mistrust and opacity. Critics see it as an avenue for “soft looting,” while defenders argue it’s essential for effective grassroots connection.

Conclusion: Clarity Is Accountability

When constituents conflate allocation with allowance, they risk misdirecting their anger or praise. A borehole funded through constituency allocation is a right, not a favour. And a town hall meeting organized from an allowance is part of a lawmaker’s duty, not charity.

For true political accountability, the public must demand transparency on both ends, developmental outcomes from allocations and representational value from allowances. Lawmakers must also educate their constituents and publish clear records, thereby reshaping political expectations from patronage to performance.