UK Court Overturns Conviction of Man Who Burned Quran, Citing Free Speech Protections

A UK court has overturned the conviction of Hamit Coskun, a 51-year-old Turkish-born man fined for burning a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish consulate in London, ruling that his actions were protected under free speech laws.

Coskun had been convicted in June by Westminster Magistrates’ Court for a religiously aggravated public order offence and fined £240. The presiding judge at the time, John McGarva, described his behaviour as “provocative and taunting” and said Coskun harboured “a deep-seated hatred of Islam.”

However, the Southwark Crown Court quashed the conviction on Friday. Delivering the ruling, Justice Bennathan said that while the act was “deeply offensive to many Muslims,” it remained within the scope of lawful expression.

“Freedom of expression must include the right to express views that offend, shock, or disturb,” Bennathan stated. “In a liberal democracy, that is the price we pay for protecting open discourse.”

Coskun welcomed the decision, saying he felt “reassured” and intended to continue speaking out about what he described as “the dangers of radical Islam.”

The February protest where the incident occurred turned violent when a man, Moussa Kadri, attacked Coskun with a knife, claiming he was defending his religion. Kadri later received a suspended sentence.

Civil liberties advocates, including the Free Speech Union and the National Secular Society, hailed the judgment as a vital precedent for protecting expression rights. Critics of the earlier ruling argued it risked reintroducing blasphemy laws—which were abolished in England and Wales in 2008.

Lord Young of Acton of the Free Speech Union said the verdict “sends a clear message that offensive or anti-religious protests, however distasteful, must be tolerated in a free society.”

ترقية الحساب
اختر الخطة التي تناسبك
إقرأ المزيد
Fintter https://fintter.com